Sazyou -:- 28 years later -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 05:50:04 (GMT)

__ Joe -:- Geez -- Are you on the cover of People? -:- Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 00:34:03 (GMT)

__ Michael Dettmers -:- 28 years later -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 19:21:17 (GMT)

__ Susan -:- other not as serious questionsfor sazyou -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 17:35:53 (GMT)

__ Joy -:- Materialism = Realization of God -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 06:48:49 (GMT)

__ __ such -:- I missed out;I took asceticism and kn seriously! -:- Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 01:27:16 (GMT)

__ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- Swami, think 'plastics' as in SmartCards which -:- Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 03:04:33 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ such -:- we were naive, but at least there's Integrity! (nt -:- Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 22:33:52 (GMT)

__ __ E. Windsor -:- It's a matter of breeding, my dear. -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 14:21:59 (GMT)

__ Bin Liner -:- Hey ,I'm lucky too... -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 02:20:54 (GMT)

__ __ CD -:- Hey have another FU2 -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:39:53 (GMT)

__ Brian Smith -:- SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU? -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 01:43:14 (GMT)

__ __ Sezyou -:- SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU? -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:34:37 (GMT)

__ __ __ TD -:- Sezyou - you haven't mentioned M killing a man? -:- Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 00:09:50 (GMT)

__ __ __ E. Windsor -:- There are exceptions -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 14:41:10 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Brian Smith -:- There are exceptions , Why of course there is -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 21:12:16 (GMT)

__ __ __ Patrick (formerly Anon) -:- SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU? -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:51:24 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ CD -:- SAY NOW -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 21:28:12 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ G -:- 'I have judged M many times' -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 23:36:43 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- SOMEONE, ANYONE, PLEASE!!!! Did CD just say that? -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 21:54:01 (GMT)

__ __ __ Brian Smith -:- To be or not to be , in a cult that is -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:42:02 (GMT)

__ __ __ Kelly -:- SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU? -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:19:33 (GMT)

__ __ __ Susan -:- respectfully -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 09:04:29 (GMT)

__ __ __ G -:- his mistakes and errors in judgement -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:47:03 (GMT)

__ Charles S. -:- Welcome to forum V... -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 00:43:24 (GMT)

__ Connie -:- 28 years later -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 00:23:44 (GMT)

__ TED Farkel -:- Can't quite believe a gal who spells her name.... -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 21:16:40 (GMT)

__ __ moldy warp -:- To TED I like wales just can't see them doing the -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 01:03:14 (GMT)

__ __ __ TED Farkel -:- Mr. Moldy Warp:TED'S got it all figgered out.... -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:50:18 (GMT)

__ Susan -:- explain to you -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 20:54:29 (GMT)

__ cq -:- 'tremendous affection ...' so he wasn't God then? -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 18:29:46 (GMT)

__ Jim -:- Without knowing you better ...... -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 18:21:51 (GMT)

__ __ Sean -:- Fair play to you Jim -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:38:17 (GMT)

__ Kelly -:- 28 years later. Watch out! -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 18:03:34 (GMT)

__ toby -:- 28 years later -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:52:54 (GMT)

__ la-ex -:- Sazyou,just one question abut the good life.... -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:22:16 (GMT)

__ E. Winsdor -:- stop being so nasty about Maharajipoos -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 16:07:10 (GMT)

__ __ Tonette -:- One of the funniest replies -:- Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 08:50:13 (GMT)

__ __ Bin Liner -:- That was a ' HOOT' .... (nt) -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:00:38 (GMT)

__ __ mildew warp -:- stop being so nasty about Maharajipoospotsamoney -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 00:31:16 (GMT)

__ Brian Smith -:- 28 years later / this story sounds too familiar -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:03:11 (GMT)

__ __ CD -:- years later its similar -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:09:34 (GMT)

__ __ __ Brian Smith -:- years later its similar -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:15:03 (GMT)

__ __ __ JohnT -:- LIAR!! -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:06:05 (GMT)

__ __ Jim -:- Well said as usual, Brian -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 20:13:03 (GMT)

__ __ Postie -:- Very eloquent Brian - you're so autodidactic. (nt) -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:06:02 (GMT)

__ __ __ Brian Smith -:- Good advice for Sezyou,she should also become more -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 20:26:07 (GMT)

__ __ __ Postie -:- One simple question, Sezyou -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:31:15 (GMT)

__ __ AJW -:- That's a great post Brian. (nt) -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:29:38 (GMT)

__ __ __ gErRy -:- Sazyou, show us yer tits !!! -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:15:14 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Thelma -:- gErRy, show us yer tits !!! -:- Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 07:34:56 (GMT)

__ __ AJW -:- Brian, let's get serious for a moment... -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:26:25 (GMT)

__ __ __ Brian Smith -:- I get mine at Bi-Mart, I paid 4 bucks for the -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:35:04 (GMT)

__ AJW -:- An invitation to Sazyou. -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:36:19 (GMT)

__ Hal -:- 28 years later- I'm free -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:07:15 (GMT)

__ janet -:- 28 years later--me too -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:25:10 (GMT)

__ __ AJW -:- janet, we should... -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:50:22 (GMT)

__ __ Marianne -:- Well sazyou.... -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:23:55 (GMT)

__ JohnT -:- OK -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:43:05 (GMT)

__ Abi -:- SF -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:15:41 (GMT)

__ Hal -:- My , my , aren't we smug . nt -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:01:11 (GMT)

__ Abi -:- 28 years later -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:54:12 (GMT)

__ salam -:- gaga agagag -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:39:08 (GMT)

__ __ DeProGram Anand Ji -:- Live and Let Live -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:31:20 (GMT)

__ __ Aussi Ji -:- Go for the jugular salam -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:43:07 (GMT)

__ __ __ salam -:- Can not do that -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:49:34 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ AJW -:- salam -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:02:33 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ salam -:- That's what you get for selling old cars -:- Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 14:09:36 (GMT)

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 05:50:04 (GMT)
From: Sazyou
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: 28 years later
Message:

Dear everyone here,

First of all, I’m fortunate to have the most wonderful family. I’ve been married for eighteen years to a funny, creative, loving, brilliant man (who I met while living in the ashram, by the way). We have two smart, sweet, strong and beautiful teenage kids who actually – knock on wood – like and love us and enjoy our and each other’s company.

Next, my husband and I have a great business; over the past eleven years we’ve built a consulting company (we now have three other consultants and two support people) that works with major corporations. We offer great work, our clients like and respect us, and we do very well financially.

We also are blessed with a wonderfully supportive wider circle of friends and family, some of whom are students of Maharaji and some not. My husband and I are both close to our siblings and our moms (our dads died many years ago).

We live in a big, comfortable house on a river, surrounded by woods, with two dogs, two cats and assorted wildlife. My husband gardens and makes custom music mixes. In my (not very) spare time, I connect with friends, travel with my family, dabble in architecture, read voraciously and write science fiction.

Barring huge downturns in the economy, we hope to retire in twelve years or so, and devote our time to traveling (we’ve considered retiring to Wales), writing and helping support Maharaji’s work. (Which, from my point of view, consists of three things: letting people know that Knowledge exists; making it available to those who want to receive it; providing opportunities for those who practice Knowledge to focus on it in more depth).

I enjoy practicing Knowledge, and I have tremendous affection and appreciation for Maharaji. Over the years I’ve experienced him as an inspiring and insightful teacher about life, a wonderful parent to his children (who are delightful), the hardest worker I know, and an amazing autodidact.

So, explain to me again how I’m deluded and emotionally crippled and am part of a cult?

Warmly,
Sezyou

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 00:34:03 (GMT)
From: Joe
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: Geez -- Are you on the cover of People?
Message:

Sazyou:

I wanted to thank you for taking the time from your perfect and idyllic life to stoop to the level of communication with mere eathlings. It must be trying for you.

Look, if you are as happy as you say you are, why are you tearing yourself away from perfection to talk about it? Good luck to you.

There are just lots of people who have had a very different experience with Maharaji, knowledge, and his cult, including me.

Joe

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 19:21:17 (GMT)
From: Michael Dettmers
Email: dettmers@gylanix.com
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later
Message:

Dear Sezyou,

I have just now logged onto EPO and read your post. I have not read all of the replies to it so perhaps what I have to say has already been said. I am almost certain I know who you are and, if I am right, you know I have a great deal of love and respect for you. You certainly appear to be living an idyllic life and I am sincerely happy for you. Given what I know about you, I am confident that your life would be just as wonderful as it is without Maharaji, notwithstanding your love and appreciation for him. I say this because I know that you live your life in alignment with certain values and principles. Without getting too spiritual or philosophical, let’s just say that your love of, and virtuosity in, music has endowed you an innate as well as cultivated appreciation for harmony, beauty and love and they that manifest in all domains of your life.

I suggest that long ago you identified Maharaji as the embodiment of those values as did I and, it appears that, since then, you have found no reason to think otherwise. At first, it was not easy for me to think otherwise as well, despite all of the evidence I knew to the contrary. Let me assure you, however, that all of the reports I have made on this site about Maharaji’s behavior are factual.

Specifically, you say, “even Michael Dettmers, who initially 'revealed' that M was drinking heavily during the early 80s, has said M's not an alcoholic -- in fact, MD made it very clear that M never drank the night before he flew. Alcoholics are not able to control their drinking in that way. And I haven't heard anyone with information newer than 15 years old about M's drinking habits.” To be accurate, I said that I didn’t have any personal experience with alcoholics to be able to make a diagnosis about alcoholism. What I did was report Maharaji’s drinking behavior in some detail and many people on this Forum who did have experience with alcoholism, either personally or as the victims of an alcoholic’s abuse, explained why Maharaji drinking patterns and the behavior fit the classic description of an alcoholic. And, by the way, his heavy drinking did not begin in the early 80’s. I first witnessed it in 1975 and I was told by Bob Mishler and others that it had been going on for some time before then.

Also, I did not say that Maharaji never drank the night before he flew. During the many years I was around him, he drank every night sometimes much heavier than others. On the night before he flew, he stopped at the prescribed number of hours required before his next flight as specified by the FAA. If you read the posts about alcoholic behavior, that fact does not mean that he isn’t an alcoholic. Given my first hand experience of his many bouts of drunkenness and incidents of drunk driving, I would be very surprised to learn that he stopped drinking in the 90’s. In any case, how would you know? You may have been around Maharaji, but you were never x-rated, and none of the current x-rated PAMs are going to come forward and report on Maharaji’s current drinking behavior, are they?

But here is why I am convinced that he is still abusing alcohol. He continues to this day to deflect any and all responsibility for his failed mission onto others. In his recent training sessions with organizers, he blames all of the concepts, mistakes, and abuse about the ashrams on the Indian mahatmas and others. He is simply incapable of taking responsibility for his actions. Élan Vital’s website is filled with revisionist lies and hypocrisy. To cite but one example, Maharaji takes credit for helping America fight the war on drugs while simultaneously he and his x-rated staff were getting stoned night after night in his Malibu residence.

As a proud and loving mother of two wonderful children, I am amazed to hear you say, “the only allegation I believe is true is that Jagdeo molested children, which I think is horrible. If M knew about it and didn't respond, that would be a grave error in judgment.” Well, in June of last year, Élan Vital claimed on its website that none of the alleged victims had ever come forward. Understandably, this lie infuriated Susan. But rather than leave it at that, I wrote a personal letter to Maharaji with an enclosed letter from Susan in which she explained the circumstances of her abuse – abuse which she reported twice before. How did Maharaji respond? He turned the matter over to Élan Vital. You can read how they washed their hands of this matter on this site.

Maharaji’s mis-handling of the Jagdeo matter was the final straw for me. I decided to came forward and expose Maharaji for the coward and hypocrite that he is. The Jagdeo matter is far more serious than a simple error in judgment. Maharaji's whole career is a litany of his errors in judgment, all of them well documented on this site. In my opinion, he lacks the character, the ethics, and the values that I believe are the foundation of you personal, family and professional life. He claims his message is love but his life is a testament to cynicism and greed. You deserve much better from your so-called Master. Better yet, you and your family don’t need a master at all.

Sincerely,

Michael

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 17:35:53 (GMT)
From: Susan
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: other not as serious questionsfor sazyou
Message:

1) how long have you been reading the forum, some of what you say indicates a while?

2) Is this the first time you have ever posted?

3) Did you ask your kids to post? Are you posting as your kids? Is your whole family discussing the ex site? What about your husband, is he going to post to, has he?

4) Do you discuss the ex site with an of your ex or current premie friends?
?
5) I assume you live in so. cal. am i right?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 06:48:49 (GMT)
From: Joy
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: Materialism = Realization of God
Message:

Premies seem to think the ultimate attainment in life -- which used to be realization of Knowledge (whatever that entailed) -- is now materialistic acquisition, in imitation of M's 'perfect' realization of this goal.

I first noticed this phenomenon when I was back in the ashram, not a penny to my name, and the initiators all started trying to dress in silk blouses and fancy clothes and jewelry, mimic-ing M and his wife. Most of them seemed positively obsessed with shopping and trying to kit themselves out as luxuriously as possible (a real affront to people who'd slaved for years doing full time service, or who handed over their entire paychecks and never had a cent to spend on themselves).

While I see nothing wrong with enjoying the things of the world, the premies and Maharaji have made a religion out of it, and it's kind of sickening. It's the ultimate result of a lifestyle which places 'me' first, and M right up there with self-gratification as the way to achieve happiness. Perhaps someone should have enlightened Mother Teresa or Mahatma Gandhi that this was the appropriate path to happiness, poor misguided souls.

Everyone's responses here have been tremendous. I'd like to see some kind of reply from Sazyou to each and every one of them. Are you up for it, girl? Can you respond to each of the questions in Janet's post below, and tell us please, how you are NOT in a cult?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 01:27:16 (GMT)
From: such
Email: None
To: Joy
Subject: I missed out;I took asceticism and kn seriously!
Message:

rupees, pounds, pesos, dinaros, and dollars,

Armani, Mercedes, and coiffed poodle collars,

By the way, there's a lucrative pyramid scheme,

to fulfill Mahamaya of the new premie dream.

Gee, maybe we shoulda just listened to our parents and their friends, way back when... think 'plastics'.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 03:04:33 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: None
To: such
Subject: Swami, think 'plastics' as in SmartCards which
Message:

are one day envisaged as being (according to EV) identity/credit cards with a combined debit card account for shopping for divine tchochkes and eating divine food at divine restaurants and sending in all the divine moola to the divine urug.

Me too, a poor old armchair yogi. I guess we both believed that it is better to store our treasures where moth and dust do not corrupt.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 22:33:52 (GMT)
From: such
Email: None
To: Pat Conlon
Subject: we were naive, but at least there's Integrity! (nt
Message:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz fell asleep in meditation this morning

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 14:21:59 (GMT)
From: E. Windsor
Email: None
To: Joy
Subject: It's a matter of breeding, my dear.
Message:

Dear Joy and Everyone,

My husband and I always find that when one is faced with frearfully unpleasant people, especially lower class types, the best thing is simply to ignore them. We lift our chins and sniff the air and turn away. One mustn't encourage them, they simply get worse. We don't like talking about unpleasant things which is why we can say that we've never had a single complaint from any of our clients, that our marriage is just ideal, that our friends are all fabulous and that our children respect and adore us. We simple edit out all the rather vulgar aspects of life because as Maharaji so often tells us, life is to be enjoyed. One doesn't want to let Mind stop us from understanding that 'Experience' does one.

We did have a rather tricky old time of it recently because our dear little peke Stinky was rather constipated and subsequently got a rather nasty hernia. These peddies always have the odd problem but they ARE worth the money. We had to dash him off to our vet, whom we've always found to be simply wonderful. We were all rather upset about it as Stinky was in so much pain and rather grumpy too. We prayed for him and meditated. You'll all be glad to hear that By His Grace Muffy is now much better. We find it easier to talk about the rear-ends of our darling little pets than the vulgar things you lower class types seem so very het up about. Why discuss dull old things like politics and religion when everyone who has any breeding at all knows it is not the done thing and is certainly something we never encourage at our dinner parties. But I must say the people we know would never dream of being so crass.

You all seem soo eager to hear from me which is rather touching, but I must say that I find all of your posts rather vulgar and I simply do not have either the time or the inclination to engage with you. One must get on mustn't one.

And anyhow, we're hosting a large dinner party tonight with some fellow students of our darling Maharaji. (Of course most of them hold very high ranking positions within Elan Vital - such a fab name isn't it!) I have to supervise our staff and make sure everything is just so before they arrive.

I do hope you all manage to sort yourselves out but one can't help the type of parents one has and I expect most of yours were a bad sort. It's all a matter of breeding isn't it.

Oh, must dash, Stinky is calling for me. Hope it's not another hernia!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 02:20:54 (GMT)
From: Bin Liner
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: Hey ,I'm lucky too...
Message:


... I have a wonderful wife who's an atheist , but who never objected to me going to events etc when I was a premie .

2 charming children , & close family living nearby .

We live in an agricultural worker's cottage built in 1865 ,& last modernised around 1956.

It's rented.

We're broke ....so what?

FUCK YOU .

The reason I'm not a premie anymore hasn't got anything to do with my wallet .

Has your consultancy business got anything to do with motivating dumb fucks , like me , to churn out toasters 24 hrs a day ?

If so don't retire to Wales .

They really don't like people like you there.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:39:53 (GMT)
From: CD
Email: None
To: Bin Liner
Subject: Hey have another FU2
Message:

How to do a FU2
Wow.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 01:43:14 (GMT)
From: Brian Smith
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU?
Message:

There are many people here who took the time to respond to your inquiry.
Are you above returning the favor and 'connecting' with those of us who have considered your questions worthy of our time and concern?
What was your intention, to engage in an honest and open inquiry about a common experience we all took part in at one time?

Or are you merely attempting to prove how wrong we exes are and how you have it all together and your story book lifestyle proves it?

Your reticence to reply makes me feel that perhaps you consider us all persona non gratis. After all; those who have renounced GMJ could not possibly begin to imagine the error of our ways could we, and if we did we would surely beg forgiveness, return to the fold and strive to attain the same blissful contented, active and purposeful life that you have been blessed with by the Grace of GMJ. Why it only stands to reason,

What a perfect world that would be then ......... Myself, I would settle for a simple acknowledgement of my efforts to communicate with you, I would appreciate however small a response you deem me worthy of.
Sincerely, Brian Smith

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:34:37 (GMT)
From: Sezyou
Email: None
To: Brian Smith
Subject: SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU?
Message:

Brian,

I've been reading and thinking about all the replies I've received. Some were just poking fun (and I found them funny in various degrees); some felt hysterical and knee-jerk ('it's a cult and he's a megalomaniac, so nothing you say could possibly be true'); and a few - like yours - seemed sincere.

You note (I assume sarcastically) at the end of your first response to me that 'but then again, you were never in a cult and I was!' Ironically, I think that's quite possible. I know a number of premies who I think are in a cult. They practice Knowledge out of fear, they give money to Elan Vital out of some sense that bad things will happen to them if they don't, they seem to feel that they 'must' be students of M or else Knosledge won't 'work,' they refuse to acknowledge Maharaji's mistakes and errors in judgement, etc. I think that's sad. I hope that anyone who has a fear-based relationship with Maharaji or Knowledge untangles it, through whatever means they can. If that means not practicing Knowledge, or not distancing themselves from Maharaji, so be it.

In terms of the techniques of Knowelddge being ordinary and readily avaialble, that's certainly true (on this site, for example). I knew two of the techniques before receiving Knowledge. Interestingly, I had never experienced anything while practicing the techniques other than a slight calming. After being shown the techniques during my Knowledge session, I had a very different experience, and have since. I have no explanation for this, but it's accurate.

As far as all the allegations that are made against Maharaji personally on this site (that seems to be the main argument against Knowledge these days -- that he's screwed up), most of them seem to me to have very little basis in fact. For instance, the allegation that he's an alcoholic. Even Michael Dettmers, who initially 'revealed' that M was drinking heavily during the early 80s, has said M's not an alcoholic -- in fact, MD made it very clear that M never drank the night before he flew. Alcoholics are not able to control their drinking in that way. And I haven't heard anyone with information newer than 15 years old about M's drinking habits.

All the allegations about M 'forcing' people to give him money aren't supported by facts, either. I know many, many practicing premies who donate $0 to EV and aren't ostracized or pressured in any way. The separation between M's personal support and EV's funds is very clear (again, as repeatedly pointed out by Michael Dettmers).

I could go on and on. Most of the allegations against M are based on comments by a few people (which may or may not be true), then blown enormously out-of-proportion because they support the prevalent belief system on this site, and portrayed as fact.

The only allegation I believe is true is that Jagdeo molested children, which I think is horrible. If M knew about it and didn't respond, that would be a grave error in judgment..I don't know whether he did. I know that Jagdeo was packed back to India in the early 80s -- that may have been M's response. I, for one, think M is certainly capable of making mistakes. However, even given that one of M's 'employees' behaved in this abhorrent way, I don't believe that makes M a monster, as you seem to do.

Also, unlike a lot of the people on this site who acknowledge they have never had any personal interaction with M, I have. He has been unfailingly honest, insightful, funny and kind toward me and in my presence. (As Michael D also stated when he first began to post.)

Unlike most of the people who populate this site, I don't care whether or not anyone practices Knowledge. If it didn't give you what you were looking or hoping for, by all means, keep looking. If you felt/feel in pain or betrayed, I'm sorry you've been hurt. I just find it irritating that you all feel the need to tell me I'm deluded and in a cult, and that I'm not having the life I'm having!

Respectfully,
Sezyou

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, Mar 06, 2001 at 00:09:50 (GMT)
From: TD
Email: None
To: Sezyou
Subject: Sezyou - you haven't mentioned M killing a man?
Message:

Doesn't this bother you, or have you selected to ignore this fact?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 14:41:10 (GMT)
From: E. Windsor
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: There are exceptions
Message:

Although Stinky is in some pain I felt that because Brian has confessed to being upper-middle class then perhaps we could understand each other - so I simply had to respond. I might even invite him to dinner one day, he seems a decent sort.

Again I'n frightfully sorry if you feel that you've had a difficult time with Maharaji and I do hope, really I do, that one day you understand that it is all your fault. I mean honestly, he wasn't really the Lord of the Universe you silly things. I never once thought that, no, no, no.

I'm simply a more mature and sophisticated person than most of you - and I know Mummy aways cautioned me against not being modest but I feel I must be direct - and so it follows that I understand the true essence of Maharaji. I really do believe it is so often a matter of breeding. You either have it or you don't, you either understand Maharaji or you don't. It's very simple.

I do feel terribly sorry for you all and I would like to help but really one feels one doesn't really know where one can possibly begin.

Brian dear, next time you're in Kent do look us up we're in the book under Pat. Ronising.

toodle pip

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 21:12:16 (GMT)
From: Brian Smith
Email: None
To: E. Windsor
Subject: There are exceptions , Why of course there is
Message:

How charming darling, thank you so much for your gracious invitation. We do so appreciate it. We will be in Greece this summer so perhaps you and your brilliant husband and lovely well adjusted children could arrange to meet us there for a few days.

You could stay with us at the Agean sea villa on Chios and we shant say one bad word about our previous involvement with a greedy, selfish, lecherous, meglamanical, fraud of a spiritual teacher lest we spoil our idylic vacation.

How lovely life is don't you think dear , the next time you are in the colonies do ring us up.

toodle do,

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:51:24 (GMT)
From: Patrick (formerly Anon)
Email: None
To: Sezyou
Subject: SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU?
Message:

As far as all the allegations that are made against Maharaji personally on this site (that seems to be the main argument against Knowledge these days -- that he's screwed up), most of them seem to me to have very little basis in fact. For instance, the allegation that he's an alcoholic. Even Michael Dettmers, who initially 'revealed' that M was drinking heavily during the early 80s, has said M's not an alcoholic -- in fact, MD made it very clear that M never drank the night before he flew. Alcoholics are not able to control their drinking in that way. And I haven't heard anyone with information newer than 15 years old about M's drinking habits.

Firstly, I am married to an ex- senior British Airways Stewardess who tells me that the Captains are renowned for their drinking. As to whether Maharaji qualifies as an alcoholic I would not know, but I do however believe that the reports by various witnesses to his drinking indicates that he drank to drown his sorrows and certainly quite excessively by my standards. Such habitual drinking is highly indicative of some deep personal problems.

I for one cannot take seriously a 'Perfect Master' who privately drowned his sorrows in such a manner. Certainly his drinking indicates a lack in him which Knowledge has failed to fulfill. What's all that about?

I also saw light before receiving Knowledge. My feeling is that Maharaji's Knowledge Path simply represented an environment where there was instruction and emphasis to practice these techniques to the extent where we got the natural results. That we believed those results confirmed some special 'power' or 'blessing' from Maharaji makes no sense since it is entirely accountable to the huge amount of suggestion that was given that this was the case.

Also I believe that the methods used to indocrinate us to do these practices have been proved to be extremely questionable. We are now seeing the backlash of the harmful side-effects of the cultic influence of Maharaji. He needs to address this squarely and honestly rather than arrogantly avoiding taking resposibility for his actions.

Maybe we are all grown up now and have our own modicums of success to enjoy . Although as adults we may pride ourselves in how much we have 'moved on' in terms of lifestyle, it seems a lot harder for us to move on now from the deep-set beliefs that we still carry from our long dependance on Maharaji.

 

 

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 21:28:12 (GMT)
From: CD
Email: None
To: Patrick (formerly Anon)
Subject: SAY NOW
Message:

>My feeling is that Maharaji's Knowledge Path simply represented an environment where there was instruction and emphasis to practice these techniques to the extent where we got the natural results.

Thats pretty much how I see it.

>I for one cannot take seriously a 'Perfect Master' who privately drowned his sorrows in such a manner. Certainly his drinking indicates a lack in him which Knowledge has failed to fulfill. What's all that about?

Whether its true or not true, what I saw of M was his personal appearances and videos. I never recognized him being in a down mood or hung over. In fact I consider that he kept quit a good schedule and never failed to deliver a good presentation.

The benefit I got from those talks was the important thing to me. Not to judge M personally. Oh shure I have judged M many times. But it doesn't buy me anything to do the judging. That is my take.

CD

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 23:36:43 (GMT)
From: G
Email: None
To: CD
Subject: 'I have judged M many times'
Message:

'The benefit I got from those talks was the important thing to me. Not to judge M personally. Oh shure I have judged M many times. But it doesn't buy me anything to do the judging. That is my take.'

When you say 'I have judged M many times', what do you mean? You have seen negative things about him? Like what, care to elaborate, or are you not supposed to 'judge' him? I think 'judge' in this case is simply seeing him for the way he really is. What's wrong with that? Why deny what you know to be true? Why lie to yourself? I think being honest about him does buy you something, it buys you the real you.

By 'But it doesn't buy me anything to do the judging', are you suggesting that you should leave it to him to 'do the judging'? Consider what he does when he 'judges'. He insults, condemns, instills fear and guilt, and lies about those he 'judges'.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 21:54:01 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: CD
Subject: SOMEONE, ANYONE, PLEASE!!!! Did CD just say that?
Message:

No use trying to engage CD in a discussion because he doesn't do those. But, yes, I just NEED to talk with someone about what I just read. Really, am I dreaming or something? I could have sworn CD just wrote the following. In reply to Patrick (formerly Anon) [can't one of you guys be 'Pat' or 'Patty' or something?], who'd said this:

I for one cannot take seriously a 'Perfect Master' who privately drowned his sorrows in such a manner. Certainly his drinking indicates a lack in him which Knowledge has failed to fulfill. What's all that about?

CD actually wrote this:

Whether its true or not true, what I saw of M was his personal appearances and videos. I never recognized him being in a down mood or hung over. In fact I consider that he kept quit a good schedule and never failed to deliver a good presentation.

The benefit I got from those talks was the important thing to me. Not to judge M personally. Oh shure I have judged M many times. But it doesn't buy me anything to do the judging. That is my take.

Is this not just the dumbest thing you've ever read? Like, in your life, let's say? All CD is saying is 'Hey, I don't know if he's an alcoholic or not but so long as he fools me that's good enough'.

Time for that Catscan, Chris.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:42:02 (GMT)
From: Brian Smith
Email: None
To: Sezyou
Subject: To be or not to be , in a cult that is
Message:

Thanks for the response Sezyou, and now in the spirit of like consideration I will return the favor with a reply.

Hopefully we will open up an avenue of dialogue that will connect us as fellow human beings sincerely interested in self awareness and searching out the truth as it commonly pertains to us here.
I would like to clarify that although there was an inherent element of sarcasm in the closing statement of my last post, satire alone was not my primary focus. You were the one who raised the issue and question of not being in a cult. I was simply making a comparative statement relative to our many similarities.

You note (I assume sarcastically) at the end of your first response to me that 'but then again, you were never in a cult and I was!' Ironically, I think that's quite possible.

What is ironic about this is that we really do seem to have many parrallel realities, 18 years happily married , nice homes, loving families, financial security etc. the truth speaks plainly to these similarities. How then can it then be so different that you and I can legitimatly argue that one of us was in a cult and the other wasn't?

Lets see, our experiences took place in much over the same period of time, staring out circa '72' to present, with the same figurehead, with the same body of people and organization, committed to the same understanding or knowledge, following the same directives watching the same videos and possibly attending the same events. How is it that we can probably safely agree that did all of these same things yet, end up with different perspectives when it comes to the issue of cult or no cult.

I say we are in the same boat here as well, the same truth applies to the fact that we are either a part of a cult or not part of a cult. For instance lets say that you and I agree to meet for lunch on the Queen Elizabeth ocean liner moored in Long Beach. We both show up at the designated time and sit down across the table from one another face to face. It would be pretty darned preposterous for either of us to suggest to the other that one of us is on the USS Minnow and the other is on the QE. To blame faulty thinking on our different perceptions is so weak a position that it is meaningless.

There is really nothing at all to debate or think about in the matter, It is clear we are on the same ship, but just to be sure look at the monogrammed plate , look at the name painted on the side of the ship, I mean come'on. And to base the arguement for our difference of reality on the premise that one of us harbors some sort of fear based mentality is even more absurd.

Do you see what I am driving at here? I am not insulting you here I am just trying to illustrate that there might be some delusional thinking at work. Your next quote lends itself to this very essence of convoluted substance.

I know a number of premies who I think are in a cult. They practice Knowledge out of fear, they give money to Elan Vital out of some sense that bad things will happen to them if they don't, they seem to feel that they 'must' be students of M or else
Knosledge won't 'work,' they refuse to acknowledge Maharaji's mistakes and errors in judgement, etc.

So just by thinking we are able to alter circumstances out side of ourselves Ay, Then I could be on the minnow and you could be on the QE simutaneously after all. If you say this to be so; then you seem to be willing to suspend truth to fit the circunstances for an arguement in favor of keeping the Maharaji Myth alive based on magical abstract thought processes and not at all on reality.
Which of us then is deluded when it comes to looking at what is going on and waking up and saying that we are both in the same boat?
one of us is.......

Now in my last post I gave you several examples of why I think we are in a cult, Would you be so kind as to enlighten me as to why you think don't think this is a cult. Because just as sure as we both share many other things in common, believe me I am quite sure that this cult issue is a common bond too.
Where does truth skip a beat when it comes to what determines the practical nature of a common reality or experience.
The problem is one of us is wrong, one of us is deluded and we both need to know.
I am not perpetrating that you are not having the life that you are having. How could my or anyone else's opinion change your life anyway? do I detect a tremor of insecurity here?
And whether or not knowledge is practiced by you or anyone else is of no concern to me, I am only responsible for my own decisions about this. By the way Sezyou, the pain of facing years of betrayal is by far outweighed through the experience of joy and exhilaration of reclaiming my own free will back.

I can't help to have noticed that you have avoided answering many of the questions put to you here.
Particularly in janets post and to the question regarding acknowledgement of Maharaji's mistakes and errors in
judgement, etc. What in your opinion were these mistakes and errors?
I am very sincere about this and I really would appreciate you sharing your thoughts on these issues. If it turns out you are correct in your position then I am all for admitting it and fessing up to the facts.
I too close respectfully and await your reply,
Thank you in advance for your courage in openly discussing these very sacred and delicate issues with me.
Brian


Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:19:33 (GMT)
From: Kelly
Email: None
To: Sezyou
Subject: SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY NOW, SEZYOU?
Message:

I just have a few points to make in response.

You say. “ The separation between M's personal support and EV's funds is very clear (again, as repeatedly pointed out by Michael Dettmers).”

However EV does pay for M’s travelling expenses, which includes his whole family and entourage to travel and live in luxury wherever he goes, and probably (just an educated guess) those of his mistress Monica Lewis (I still can’t get over the hilarious co-incidence of that name) who I saw around M at events in India when his family didn’t accompany him. This would also include the luxury cars that are kept for his use all over the world. And I bet he does not personally pay for the upkeep and constant improvements to all his properties around the world, including Amaroo. I must admit I was shocked to find out that he owns it all, and just leases it back to the premies. I wouldn’t mind betting that he didn’t personally pay for the seven million dollar (or was it pounds?) yacht. And the thing that always got me…The watch collection. Maybe he pays for his own expensive watches now, I don’t know, but he sure didn’t in the past. His entire wealth has been generated by donations from premies who believed, truly believed that he was a divine incarnation, and out of ‘gratitude’ for his ‘gift’. Some gift!

You say. “MD made it very clear that M never drank the night before he flew. Alcoholics are not able to control their drinking in that way. And I haven't heard anyone with information newer than 15 years old about M's drinking habits.”

Well that is simply not true…Alcoholics can and do control their drinking in that way, this is well known among experts on the subject, and also to people like me who had alcoholic parents. As far as his current drinking habits are concerned, all I know for certain is that he is still fond of a drop of cognac! But anyway doesn’t it trouble you at all, to hear about how abusive he used to get under the influence even if it was 15 years ago. For me the news that he was an addicted smoker for all those years, he still smokes cigars at least, was also a real shocker.

You said. “He has been unfailingly honest, insightful, funny and kind toward me and in my presence.”

Well you’ve been lucky then, because I, and others, have witnessed him really bawling people out and seen him storming around in a furious rage.

That’s just a few points, there are many more. It’ll all come out in the wash as they say, and I think there’s a lot coming out soon.

Enjoy your life, as he would say. Mine is much more enjoyable since I left the cult.
Kelly

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 09:04:29 (GMT)
From: Susan
Email: None
To: Sezyou
Subject: respectfully
Message:

I appreciate how you signed that post sezyou. I also, think you are the only premie who posts here that has ever said Rawat could make a mistake.

I have thought that maybe Rawat did make a 'mistake' on the Jagdeo matter. Well, obviously he did, but maybe at the time he did something but that something was an ignorant and less than adequate response. Maybe he even regrets it now. But does he have the guts to say so? Does he have the guts to address me or Abi personally? Does he have the guts to try to find the other victims? Not so far. And I doubt he ever will. I think he is a coward, and I think he cares a lot more about himself and his own family than others, we all do probably, but I think he thinks other humans are sort of like another species than his own family.

You acklowledge he makes mistakes. Apparently you were a premie in the 70's. How can you tolerate the revisionism on his site? How can you tolerate his refusal to take any responibility for the fact that most of his followers thought he was God? It is just total BS that he was some victim of those around him, no one, no one, in DLM/EV has more control over what it is okay to say think and feel than Rawat. No one has more power than he does over premies. You know that. All premies, PWKs or whatever know that. He has never hosestly dealt with his 'mistakes'. He blames others for his mistakes. You know it, I really think you do.

If your kids are really posting here why don't you take the whole family to someone like Steve Hassan, who knows cults ( it sounds like you have the money) and see if you are in one? Seriously, I challenge you to do it. Contact him. Let an outside expert on the phenomenon of cults, one who has never been a premie, appraise whether you are in a cult or not.

And if you just take the stuff Rawat says with a grain of salt, ( but you didn't at one point or you would not have been in the ashram) than why don't you suggest to him that in no uncertain terms he should address all the remaining premies and let them no he is fallible. Suggest to he take responsibilty for any mistakes he has made and be clear about what they were. If he really wanted to stop being a cult leader, he could, I think, but that is what it would take. He hasn't done it. ( Did you join the ashram to be saved from the drug culture? I didn't, I joined it to serve the living perfect master, I joined it because I thought it was the most reasonable response to what I thought was the fact that the superior power in person had human form on the planet, and I wanted to love and serve him ) Be HONEST, with yourself, with us, and with him.

Respectfully,

Susan

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:47:03 (GMT)
From: G
Email: None
To: Sezyou
Subject: his mistakes and errors in judgement
Message:

'they refuse to acknowledge Maharaji's mistakes and errors in judgement'

Please elaborate on what you consider to be his mistakes and errors in judgement.

How do you feel about his owning a 106 foot yacht that costs about seven million dollars? What about the house in Los Angeles that he co-owns? What do you think that house is for?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 00:43:24 (GMT)
From: Charles S.
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: Welcome to forum V...
Message:

Dear Sazyou:

You sound like an intelligent, reasonable person. You also sound as if you are not really sure about what all the fuss is about here on forum V. I'm not sure how much of the information on this website you have read. If not much, if you just came onto the forum directly, I can see why you might be puzzled. In lieu of explaining what this forum and the website is about, I would ask you, as a visiting premie, to consider a few questions:

If Knowlede and M. are the Truth, then why are PWKs required to keep the techniques secret? Why not shout the 'Truth' from the rooftops?

Why are you not encouraged to talk about your own experience, except in a syrconized, scripted way?

Why can't the premies have an open forum in like this one, where they can talk to each other in real-time, without having their postings edited and re-written for them?

Why is there all these secrets around M.?

Why aren't Elan Vital's financial records available to the public, if there is nothing to hide? Even many churches, who are not required to make their records public, do so, because they wish to show their members they have nothing to hide, and want them to see where the money goes, to encourage more donations.

If you enquire about EV finances, as a long time doner (as I have, more than once), why are you given no information?

Why is the history of M and K being denied, revised and rewritten?

How is he supposed to spread this Knowlege around the world, when he is hiding and inaccessible, when their is no accounting for what happens to the money collected for this purpose?

Do you really even know this man? How consistant is he in what he says? Why are his videos heavily edited, and even recalled and pulled out of circulation? What is he really doing? Do you know?

Does the truth need to be hidden and protected? Will the truth not hold up to scrutiny and skeptisism? Isn't it only lies that need to be hidden and protected from scrutiny?

If you have been having a wonderful experience being associated with M., how much of it comes from M. himself, and how much comes from your own effort, and your faith in him? Many claim they continue to have good experiences in their practice after moving on from the guru. Even Indian stories tell of saints who only met their guru once, or were otherwise separted, who continued to have happy experiances. Is it conceivable that it may be possible for you, also?

Many Premies don't want to know about the things discussed here, because they are afraid that their 'truth', what they feel to be the truth about M., won't hold up to scrutiny. It's scary to have your illusions destroyed. But afterwards, you are left free, free to embrace something better, those things in your life that DO hold up to scrutiny. Things you don't have to be ashamed of or embarassed about, things you can actually feel GOOD about, and talk about in your own words. You are left with something you don't have to hide or protect, and that is such a relief.

I found the information on EPO difficult to reconcile with my involvement with M. and his organization. Yet, I felt there were things regarding my involvement that were helpful, but there were always things I felt uncommfortable with too. So with new information, I reexamined all of it, an how I felt about it. I concluded that the things I had liked about my experience being involved with M and K were all things that I could take with me. I could separate the wheat from the chaff, and move on. So I did.

I am not angry and bitter like some people who post on here on EPO. But I did not suffer as badly or as personally, either. I don't critisize their anger, just because I don't feel as angry. People feel the way they feel, and don't need anyone telling them they ''Should'' feel diferently.

You seem to be telling us that you feel content, and I wouldn't want you to feel otherwise. I have Premie friends, and when it comes to Maharaji, we agree to disagree. I wouldn't like them attacking me or my beliefs, and I don't attack theirs. They know they can come to me if they ever want to discuss leaving M. and moving on. I leave it at that.

I only ask you to consider these questions, because you have posted here on Forum V. I believe it is possible to have the contentment you describe, without worshiping a guru, and also without hating him. In fact, it's difficult if not impossible to experience contentment while being angry at anyone.

I don't regret learning Kriya Yoga from M., thought it has been mixed up with a lot of other stuff, like bhakti yoga, that I feel I don't need. I feel he should have been more honest about what he was teaching, bhakti yoga and kriya yoga, combined. It is the secrecy and the lies, the hidden finances and M's growing emphasis on himself (the bhakti yoga) as being more important than the kriya yoga, that have caused me to move on. While I don't hate him, I don't feel any need to defend him, either. He's a grown man now, and can defend himself, if he wants to. He's had ample opportunity (see http://www.openlettertomaharaji.org/). Many of us would be willing to hear him explain things, but he apparently dosen't wish to. He can take the consequences of that.

I still practice and enjoy the techiniques. They are called Kriya Yoga, and are freely available, from many teachers. I enjoy it so much, perhaps I'll teach it myself one day. I'd like to see everyone be content, only without having to hide things or make excuses. If many can do that with Yoga, great. To each his own. If some prefer Bhakti to Kriya, or a combination, that is their choice.

If you can live with all the questions I've mentioned above, that is also your choice, although many would ask you, how? Why? What are your answers? Many people can't live with those questions, and that is what this forum is for. You imply that you are very happy. I certainly don't want you to be otherwise! I also love to be happy! I just find it easier to do if I don't have to keep secrets and can speak my mind about any thing I like regarding my experience of life. Easier if I don't have awkward questions like the ones above haunting me, when I don't feel I have to defend things I don't agree with. Easier, when I am free to share my own experiance, without relating it to some agenda created by someone else. Easier when I am just free to be myself.

Wishing you only the best for your happiness...

- Charles S.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 00:23:44 (GMT)
From: Connie
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later
Message:

Dear Sazyou

It makes me sad to read your post.

Everything you expressed in your bio is exactly what knowledge has become:

Socio-economic position as a reflection of one's consciousness, sincerity and usefulness.

I do have some questions:

If it was one of your obviously much loved children who had been sexually abused by one of m's trusted, and m was informed about it, but never took any meaningful action, and later denied ever knowing about it, would that not affect you?

Would you not feel a moral outrage, and want to do everything in your power, as a mother, to right a wrong? Would you not feel confused, knowing, as you put it, that he is a 'wonderful parent', as well as your master, that he did nothing?

Would your heart not break for your young child knowing that they had been placed in that situation, because he was your master, in the belief that it was the best place for your child's physical, mental, emotional and spiritual needs?

Are not all children worth as much as the Rawat children?

I would appreciate an answer, as it is 28 years later for me also, and these are questions I asked myself, and there is no way I can excuse how the Jagdeo incident played out. Not even for the sake of protecting 'my experience'.

Sincerley
C

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 21:16:40 (GMT)
From: TED Farkel
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: Can't quite believe a gal who spells her name....
Message:

one way the first time, another way the second time.

So, my question to you is :are you Ms. Sezyou, or Ms. Sazyou?

I aint judging, but somethins a tad too perfect here, plus I never trust a gal who don't know how to spell her own name, or don't give the real one...

Anyway, you come down to the TRAC Center and we'll have some satsang and maybe a home brew or two.I'm a DVD premie, in case ya didn't know...

If yer lookin for retirement and service as a package deal, you might wanna consider moving to the TRAC Center in Alabama...we're doin great things here in our first synchronised year...Dave Smith and the Raja highly recommend the fine dining and licquors,friendly atmosphere,and off-beat yet down home style of devotion found in our propagational activities....

Plus, I don't know bout Wales for propagation...
Maybe I could see our Lord givin the special K to dolphins, but not wales....

Just puttin my 2 cents in,
TED Farkel
Don't get me wrong,I like wales,just can't see them doing the 4 techniques...

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 01:03:14 (GMT)
From: moldy warp
Email: None
To: TED Farkel
Subject: To TED I like wales just can't see them doing the
Message:

4 techniques. You've got me worried now. Will they be saved? Wot happens when they have left this mortal coil? Will they go to hell? Can the Lord drive up in his mercedes as they are en route to Hades and say 'hop in'and drive them right up to those pearly gates if they are not 'students'? How could they do service with flippers anyway? Oh, I forgot, they wouldn't have to now of course. But wot about Indian wales (are there such things?)- how would they get darshan? And wot if they did get K and stopped practicing. All that rotting vegetation in the ocean would get in the way of the Lord's yachting activities.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:50:18 (GMT)
From: TED Farkel
Email: None
To: moldy warp
Subject: Mr. Moldy Warp:TED'S got it all figgered out....
Message:

Dear Mr. Warp:

I think it goes somethin like this...

M just aint gonna be able to save the wales, seeing as how they just can't do the four sacred techniques..

I mean they might have a little flipper on each side, but it just aint big enough to cover their eyes or ears with.

Now maybe with the right underwater DVD instructional video they could maybe, at best, do technique #3 and #4....think about it...

So, I just don't see the wales gettin saved anytime soon, and that's why all them liberal environmentalists are trying so hard to save them wales, cos they can't save themselves, and m, even though he is the living perfect master, can't do it either...

At least that's the way I think it goes...

TED Farkel
I'm gonna tell the Raja to tell his brother to stick with saving dolphins...they're smarter than wales, and could figure something out to help with that technique #1 and #2 problem....but I just don't see much hope for the wales at this point...OK, gotta go catch the end of the video and my half drunk foamie...

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 20:54:29 (GMT)
From: Susan
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: explain to you
Message:

how you are emotionally crippled and part of a cult.

First of all, please read all of ex-premie.org, that should explain fairly well, if you read it with an open heart, why you are part of a cult. I especially would like you to read about Jagdeo, because that issue personally concerns me.

If you want to know why you are 'emotionally crippled', well, that sounds like a harsher way to describe you than I would use without knowing you.

But I do think Rawat ( your master ) is emotionally crippled. You happen to mention how much he loves his kids. A lot of premies come here and mention that as justification for why he can't be all that bad. This reminds me of yet another Sopranos episide, in which Tony et al ( and Tony LOVES his kids too) are very upset about a pedophile coach who has molested one of the mobsters daughters. In fact, Tony expresses his outrage about this coach while he as at one of his mob businesses, badabing, a strip joint, and a girl who is likely only a year older than his daughter Meadow is dancing topless right behind him. But he is a good parent....or is he?

I think Rawat's standards for what is acceptable in the care of his own children is very different than what at least was acceptable for premie children. Certainly, his handling of the Jagdeo issue shows this, I am sure Jagdeo was never near Wadi or Daya again after I reported, in 1977, that Jagdeo was a child molester. But Jagdeo was not stopped from traveling the country where he was treated with reverence and respect and had access to premie children. Double standard?

One thing I hear is that Rawat forced his mistress, Monica Lewis, to have more than one abortion. If true, this seems bizarrely hypocritical. His kids matter only if they are Marolyn's? And why were some premies counseled by initiators that Rawat thought they should have abortions, and others forbidden too. Did he have Divine Inspiration about which kids were worth keeping? On all counts, I think the answer lies in what Rawat loves most, MONEY. If Monica had Rawat's love child, it could hurt the bottom line, in donations. If a potentially wealthy premie in the seventies had a family, they could not give their all in the ashram.

Later, Rawat, like Tony, got a little brighter, and thought long term, and premies were allowed to build businesses, and have educations and careers. The ashrams were short sighted. Just like Tony's uncle selling H on the garbage run. That way they are a continued source of income. For example, if Rawat had not taken Joe Whalen's trust fund, Joe had not dropped a full scholarship to Georgetown Law School, just think of the bucks that Rawat could be tithing off of Joe at this very moment, if he had stayed in the cult.

I am sincerely glad you are happy and your family is doing so well. That is all that matters. Your experience. I am happy, and my family is doing well too, but I happen to think that the devatation the cult and Rawat have laid on so many humans is important and worth talking about. Other people matter, not just me. I hope that you feel the same way, and I hope you read the whole site, with an open heart and and open mind.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 18:29:46 (GMT)
From: cq
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 'tremendous affection ...' so he wasn't God then?
Message:

Sazyou, forive me for saying this, but you do sound like you found Maharaji out of the pages of 'Country Life' magazine.

Strange how affiliation with him seems to have become (for some ill-informed people) socially desirable.

You really should find out more about his decidedly tawdry past, dear, before you go singing his praises to all and sundry. You know perfectly well that, if you're going to profess an interest in matters spiritual, you just HAVE to choose a teacher who's beyond reproach. There's far too many of these guru-chappies with tarnished backgrounds around. It can't be done to be seen with them, you know.

And really my dear, if you think this Maha chappie's philosophy is something you could even mention to the Barrington-Fforbes-Smythes, well, you'd better think again. 'Within inside' indeed! - the poor chap obviously doesn't even know the meaning of tautology. And 'inside' is where he should be, if you ask me, (as a guest of Her Majesty, you understand).

Maybe you've forgotten, but Maharaji is a man who once pretended to be God incarnate. Who has used people's spirituality for his own ends. Who continues to do so to this day.

That's not an easy thing to forgive. What's more, that's not something I would like to see happen to any of my friends.

I really would recommend extreme caution when dealing with M. He's deceived too many, and gotten away with far too much for his own good.

DO be a sensible girl now, and find something more suited to your social aspirations. If the likes of Richard Gere can manage to penetrate the Dalai Lama's intimate circle (if you pardon the expression), then I'm sure you can do better than the likes of Prem Pal ('I can show you God') Singh.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 18:21:51 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: Without knowing you better ......
Message:

Sazyou,

I guess you enjoyed 'E Winsdor''s parody, huh? Di you think you deserved any of that? Yeah? Which part?

See, you really do come across as just a tad superficial. You say so many things that just cry out for further discussion. Things about yourself, things about Maharaji. What I want to know is, do you really want to talk about this? I mean, really? Well, I guess I'll assume the answer's yes and that you're not just here for a few little rabbit punches and a fast getaway. Ok, let's talk.

Just the other day, EV's daily email newsletter had a quote of Maharaji's that seemed to suggest that he's offering you some form of immortality. It's around here somewhere. Maharaji was talking last fall about how, though the body's simply clay and will wear away one day, the knowledge won't. The 'heart' won't. 'Understanding' won't.

So, yeah, I take it that he's saying that you've actually got something eternal you can stay with beyond life and death.

Now you say that Maharaji's an 'inspiring and insightful teacher'. So what do you say about that teaching? What exactly was he saying? Ok, I know this isn't fair. Here, I'll find the quote for you:

People look for immortality. Immortality exists, of course, but not where you're looking for it. People go out, and there they are - jogging 900 miles every day, in the interests of keeping in shape. But saints have called this body clay. When it begins to rain, it can't be kept in shape. The seasons will come. You will slow down. And you will be tempered. Yet, even in that moment, the same reality inside you will continue to beat. The heart does not age. The real heart that I'm talking about does not age. When joy comes, how it is received does not age. Understanding does not age. Knowledge does not age. Happiness does not age. These are the things that don't change.

There it is.

Ok, so like I was asking, what's he saying? Is he giving you immortality or not?

Alright, let's be honest. You and I both know that you don't REALLY know what the fuck he's talking about. You might guess a bit but that's a far cry from really knowing, right? I mean, isn't that one of the reasons that Maharaji doesn't get you to stand up at public programs and explain his teachings on immortality and such? AS IF, huh? AS IF you know anything about that!

But yet you call him an 'insightful teacher'. So what exactly ARE his insights here? Hm?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:38:17 (GMT)
From: Sean
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Fair play to you Jim
Message:

Sure and yer a good man yerself! Direct & insightful.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 18:03:34 (GMT)
From: Kelly
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later. Watch out!
Message:

As your insightful teacher about life would himself say, if things are going well that's when you're in real trouble!' I know, I heard him say it over and over again, it's one of his favourite pieces of insight isn't it? The other thing he might say is 'what the hell has all that got to do with knowledge?'

And I ask you..'what the hell has it got to with anything? whether you have a comfortable successful life or not?
I do too, I've got two dogs too!! but I have also recently realised, 30 years later, that I've been in a cult whose leader is so deeply flawed as to be positively corrupt.

I really wish there was something I could say to you that would help you to realise that too. Because, although I have been shaken to the core of my being, I now feel an immense sense of relief and freedom, to be out of the very limiting confines of the belief system that surrounds him. His claim that this is the best thing happening in this world, is just newspeak for I am the Perfect Master of our time. Do you still believe that?

I promise you there's a big wide world out here, outside of Maharaji's world, outside of 'The World of Knowledge'. Don't you see how limiting that is, it's just like any other organised cult or religious movement, it separates you from the rest of humanity. You think you've got something special. Right?

My thoughts when first visiting this website were...Well if I really do have the ultimate truth, then it's got to stand up to close scrutiny. In the words of another guru 'Face everything and avoid nothing' Can you face the truth about Maharaji?

I hope you can
Kelly

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:52:54 (GMT)
From: toby
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later
Message:

hi,

I can only say after studying all of the information of insiders
that you are the perfect victim of the picture painted by m.

You have no Idea what is really going on at m's residence , with
his family ,but
I guess ,
you really wouldn't want to know!
It takes courage!
So dream on about the perfect master, loving father, caring husband......
It's ok

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:22:16 (GMT)
From: la-ex
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: Sazyou,just one question abut the good life....
Message:

Dear Sazyou-

First of all, congratulations on the good life that you seemed to have created and been blessed with. It certainly seems idyllic in many ways.

I have a number of questions, but really just one jumps out at me at the moment, and I sincerely would like to pose it to you and your partner (and kids, if they have knowledge).

I think that most people believe that, in addition to all of the material pleasures, treats and toys that we can enjoy, (especially those of us who are doing well in affluent societies)
there is another area of life concerning values,ethics,honesty, integrity etc.,that also must be in place, for a truly wonderful life to thrive. I certainly believe this, and everyone I know does as well.

OK, enough preaching from me, but I had to set up the question.

Question is: does any of maharaji's personal life and obvious hypocrisies bother you? I'm not talking just about the allegations of drugs, alcoholism, extra marital affairs,rampant materialism etc., but the obvious 'rewriting of history' that he does himself (or has authorized) on his web site.

How can you tell other people about maharaji and knowledge without telling them 'the rest of the story'?
Don't you feel sleazy and dishonest, if you tell a new person the 'good stuff', but not the 'bad stuff' as well?
Aren't you giving them not only an incomplete, but deliberately altered and dishonest picture of what he is really like?
And this is the man that they will have a lifetime relationship with? And your skewed (whether you do it directly yourself, or indirectly through parroting Elan Vital's revised history)introduction of him to the new person is their first introduction to you and the organization?

What will they think of you, when they realize that you have hidden things from them(I am assuming that you don't tell them everything. If you do tell them everything, I applaud your honesty, however, I don't think it will help in the recruitment, or propagation drive.)Won't they mistrust you and possibly dislike you if you tell them all the sugary sweet stuff, while leaving out all the other stuff? I believe they should know EVERYTHING, then make up their own mind about it.

I am really curious about your position on this, and would sincerely welcome an honest reply.
Up until a year ago, I was a stalwart premie for 28 years,telling many people about m and k, until I woke up one day and began to see maharaji in an entirely different light. It really is an 'awakening' and a liberating experience to see the truth. I would be happy to share more of it with you if you'd like.

Sincerely,
La-ex

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 16:07:10 (GMT)
From: E. Winsdor
Email: None
To: everyone
Subject: stop being so nasty about Maharajipoos
Message:

Dear Everyone (if I may)

I am blessed with a frightfully delightful family, a husband who is playful, brilliant, witty and kind and children who, goodness, actually simply adore us to bits. They go to an expensive private school just as my husband and I did. We run a large corporation and everyone who works for us also simply adores us. I'm not sure what it is about us but I suppose we just can't help but make oodles of money and please people too. We've never had a single complaint from any of our clients. We host many fab dinner parties and have a very large circle of friends all of whom we adore. We live in a large mansion surrounded by a sweet little wood. All of the animals who live in the wood love us and we love them too. We have a bouncy red setter, a sweet little peke, a fluffy little cat, along with two goldfish and several hamsters. They love us and appreciate our healthy family environment.
In my spare time I devote myself to intellectually enriching and creative pursuits as one should. My husband plays golf and we often have fun times at the Country Club with our wonderful friends.

When we are not dashing madly about being adored and making lots and lots of money we sit on our large expensive bed and force our tongues down the back of our throats, press our fingers onto our eyeballs and stick our thumbs into our ears. Not to each other of course. That would be silly! But I must say my sexy husband has suggested it a few times but I just giggled and told him to keep his naughty little tongue to himself- the devil!

We follow a plump multi-millionare Guru who lives in Malibu. He is just adorable and we like the way he makes things so simple for us. We have long realised that it is rather crude to worry about social welfare issues. We rather miss Maggie and think that this Tony man is rather loud. I'm sure that Maggie would have approved of the way our Guru has become a self-made man, so to speak. It is sooo dull to harp on about other people having more money. You simply have to make it your self. As far as we're concerned if people have problems it is their own fault. It is exactly what our Guru so often tells us. We think that the people who post on this rather ghastly forum should really just stop being so dull. We don't like the nasty things you say about our Maharajipoos and we wish you would stop. So there!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 08:50:13 (GMT)
From: Tonette
Email: None
To: E. Winsdor
Subject: One of the funniest replies
Message:

I've ever read!!!!!!!!!!!!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:00:38 (GMT)
From: Bin Liner
Email: None
To: E. Winsdor
Subject: That was a ' HOOT' .... (nt)
Message:

hoot

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 00:31:16 (GMT)
From: mildew warp
Email: None
To: E. Winsdor
Subject: stop being so nasty about Maharajipoospotsamoney
Message:

On how true E. Winsdor. I too think concern about social issues such as redistribution of wealth and all that are so dull. Really I would rather concentrate on myself, and those finger-poking techniques are just sooper for that. after I have gazed at my own metaphorical navel under my blanket, well, the whole of the rest of my wonderfool day is spent thinking about how best to fulfill myself. I have found like you that the pursuit of luxury is actually the most profound spiritual practice -really I don't know what that silly Jesus chap was on about.Of course I do have a former friend (moldy warp) whom i don't really like to talk about, but I will cos I like a good gossip. Well she's gone completely off her trolley and thinks there is more to life than getting lots of money from poor people and spending it on fine champagne, yachts and all the other important things in life. I heard a rumour that she has even joined the Labour Party and was last seen talking to a homeless person (yuk!)

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:03:11 (GMT)
From: Brian Smith
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later / this story sounds too familiar
Message:

Our stories sound remarkably similiar, I have been married 18 years to a wonderful, brillant talented women, whom I met as a premie. No kids of our own, but my children from a former marriage love and respect us, we are close to our living mothers, and family members and have many wonderful and interesting friends. We have done very well finacially, through business investments and good fortune I could retire today if I chose to, we take great vacations where ever we want to go quite often.

We live in a large beautiful home, with a big swimming pool, with flower gardens and a fishpond. We dabble in musicial enterprises, we play in bands locally, she a vocalist, I a bass player. We have 4 pets three purebread shelty dogs and a 16 year old cat. We are interested in literature and we write for our own amusement.
A very comfortable, happy and normal life.

Apparently the main difference here in our stories is that
I joined a cult in 1972 I was deluded for 28 years and I emotionally crippled and enslaved myself to a dependancy on the Lord of the Universe and his cult.

Congratulations on being so clever as to have avoided all of that.

The tone of your post does not impress me as being open to an inquiry of the questions you pose. You seem more like a captured bird in a guilded cage using your creature comforts and accoplishments in life as an agruement in favor of your position to stay where you are, than of a person seeking honest answers.

I suggest you look around this site and review some of the facts regarding Maharaji's activities, fundraising, and ethical standards. Read the journals entries, check out the origins GMJ's
teachings based on the Radhasoami traditions and gather some more data.

For me amoung other things it took realizing that the techniques are quite ordinary, they are quite commonly dispensed particularly in India and many other places of the world and the dispensor does not refer to himself as the Lord of the Universe, or even master. They are typically veiwed as simple life lessons and are freely passed about with no strings and emotional bondage attached.

In other cultures, one can easily declare oneself a sadhu although it usually is an elder and then spend their remaining years wandering freely about and revealing the wisdom and/or knowledge. There is no necessity for a master, what you know is already within you and what you have is the ability to master your own destiny. Unless of course you give away your free will and surrender your independance willingly, naively, or are unknowingly duped out of it.

Maharaji passed along this same info, only he capitalized on peoples ignorance of Indian traditions and naivety (particularly westerners) and led us to believe that we cannot understand our own inner nature without dependancy on him for the rest of our lives. He sets up this master devotee relationship and locks up our perspective and free will forever. This thing about the master being more important than anything else is a lie, it is emotionally and spiritually crippling and we pretend like it isn't. This is a tactic a cult leader uses to create dependancy.

I bought the story because M was one of the first and most dramatic (he attracted my attention being 14 years old) of the east indian gurus to show up here with the ancient meditation methods and the age old wisdoms (satsang) of the Hindi culture?
I was in the right head space then, young and impressionable full of youthful exuberance and curiousity and dissatisfied with social conventions and answers.

I used to think he had extraordinary abilities, now I no longer think so. What is so extraordinary about a man who falls victim to his own ordinary sexual desires and has extra marital affairs. He professes to take a stand against drugs and alcohol, but it has been reported by former premies who had close contact with him that he smoked, drank and used drugs regularly. See the Michael Dettmers reports in the archives.

A cult leader lets the cult hold him above the standards that he recommends of his followers, if we become aware of the leaders indecretions, the cult expects us to justify those inconsistancies as the masters test of our faith. The cult does not require the same rules that apply to the folowers apply to the cult leader. Hey he did it for your own good, it was just a lila, you passed the test, now please send in your monthly remittance and get ready for the next one. Through my own eyes I see the wool being pulled over them, while in the cult I gladly pulled the wool down on myself and others under the guise of a divine game (lila) supported by and created by group concepts. Where is this kind of logic accepted or apply anywhere else in life except in a cult?

I took a look at the greedy accumulation of wealth, the weak morality, the constant demand for more money to support a lavish lifestyle. I look at those facts myself and I simply see pure greed, and bad example. If I look at them from the standpoint of cult mentality then I can say he is the lord and he deserves more. This impaired judgement frees me from personal responsibility for independant decisions and lets the group (cult) answer and decide. This is what a cult does.

I look at the stripped down version of what used to be knowledge, satsang, service, and meditation to todays dry and sterile video events. Only a cult leader could convince me years ago that the only way to liberation was through the 3 legged stool, satsang service and Meditation.
Then change his mind and stop personal satsang, turn service into little more than fundraising for money and turn the knowledge sessions into a group of large impersonal affairs and offer no answers for this course of action other than leaving me to sift through this underlying agreement that I am not supposed to think about why he does things, he is god incarnate.
This is cult mentalily and it is sublime and it is perpetrated and ingrained by our silent acceptance.

If your husband cheated on you, lied to you, expected you to hold him above accountability for his actions , misrepresented himself towards you, was abusive. What emotions might you feel and what amends would you require for him to reinstate himself in your high regard again?

I'll bet you would be angry, hurt and probably lose trust in him, you would demand explanations, and you would require accountability, to name a few remedys. You would act this way because your normal healthy emotions are intact. Or would you go into complete denial cover up the secrets and emotionally cripple yourself to protect the relationship?

How is it we do not deal that same way with the guru ,why is it a different emotional investment there, Ask yourself is this dysfunctional? perhaps crippled? you said it! Now do some research, this site has much information and links containing data you need to be aware of.

This is cult mentality, and it is fostered, it is imbedded deeply and if it sounds familiar or rings true then it is probably is, Yes I was in a cult , I was emotionally enslaved and deluded for 28 years and so are you.

At least I can admit it, and I let go a month ago, I am not sure you are ready to Sezyou. It would surprise me very much if you admitted to anything similar in the rest of our familar story but then again you were never in a cult and I was!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:09:34 (GMT)
From: CD
Email: None
To: Brian Smith
Subject: years later its similar
Message:

>For me amoung other things it took realizing that the techniques are quite ordinary, they are quite commonly dispensed particularly in India and many other places of the world and the dispensor does not refer to himself as the Lord of the Universe, or even master.

It took you 28 years to figure this part out?
This was fairly common information about 28 years ago as I remember it.
If you have never had a good strong experience doing the meditation and what M has said has not inspired you, then you are doing the right thing changing your opinion.

How can you see the fundraising stuff as a big deal. I have heard and read lots of the dollar numbers over the years and contributed some myself. Tiger Woods is making $2M for playing a tournament this weekend. Now thats some quick big money.
And apparently the Beatles made $70M last year.
Now what is the total real EV budget?

People who continue to listen to M talks do it because they get something personally out of it. If they don't, they leave. No mystery.

CD

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:15:03 (GMT)
From: Brian Smith
Email: None
To: CD
Subject: years later its similar
Message:

For me amoung other things it took realizing that the techniques are quite ordinary,they are quite commonly dispensed particularly in India and many other places of the world and the dispensor does not refer to himself as the Lord of the Universe, or even master.

It took you 28 years to figure this part out?

No it did not, I found that info out in 1972, just before I left for Inda , but I deluded myself for 28 years because I wanted to believe the Myth that M was LOTU.

How can you see the fundraising stuff as a big deal.

I don't see it as a big deal. I know that it takes lots of money to run any huge operation and fund the cause.
What I suggest is that he funnels more than his fair share into his own pocket for his own selfish purposes.
There are many worthy causes that we once were led to believe that GMJ was going to champion that he somehow never did follow through on.
If you were around back in the early 70's, just hum a few bars of who is Guru Maharaji , and when you get to the part where it says 'watch who'll be feeding all the people' then tell me where and when did that benevolent attitude vaporize?
Where is Maharaji's charitable committment, even Werner Erhard of the EST movement who also lined his pockets based on self awareness movements developed and funded many humanitarian projects and gave back to many worthy projects, most notably the hunger project, which he has made a huge global impact on.

It seems that GMJ can take it but he can't dish it out, money and tithing that is.
If he has please enlighten me,
Thanks

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:06:05 (GMT)
From: JohnT
Email: None
To: CD
Subject: LIAR!!
Message:

 

 

USELESS LIAR!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 20:13:03 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Brian Smith
Subject: Well said as usual, Brian
Message:

Hey, Brian, would you please email me when you get a chance. Just want to say hi and talk about music a bit.

jamesheller@home.com

Thanks,

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:06:02 (GMT)
From: Postie
Email: None
To: Brian Smith
Subject: Very eloquent Brian - you're so autodidactic. (nt)
Message:

nt

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 20:26:07 (GMT)
From: Brian Smith
Email: None
To: Postie
Subject: Good advice for Sezyou,she should also become more
Message:

autodidact (self taught, I admit I had to look it up in the dictionary!!!!} A good new word for my new outlook on life

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 17:31:15 (GMT)
From: Postie
Email: None
To: Sezyou
Subject: One simple question, Sezyou
Message:

You write very persuasively and with obvious conviction so my question is: If all that you say is true, and I'm sure believe it is true, why are you reading and posting on this site?

Oh, I lied, I want to ask one more question.

You wrote: So, explain to me again how I’m deluded and emotionally crippled and am part of a cult?
Warmly, Sezyou

My question: Is that a rhetorical question or a subconcious cry for help? Ask yourself that from the third row in Portland.

Sincerely and with concern for your next 28 years,
Postie

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:29:38 (GMT)
From: AJW
Email: None
To: Brian Smith
Subject: That's a great post Brian. (nt)
Message:

anth

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:15:14 (GMT)
From: gErRy
Email: None
To: AJW
Subject: Sazyou, show us yer tits !!!
Message:

Aw heck, somebody had to say it...

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 07:34:56 (GMT)
From: Thelma
Email: None
To: gErRy
Subject: gErRy, show us yer tits !!!
Message:

No, gErRy - not somebody or just anybody - it had to be you.

Don't you have any respect? We're talking about sacred stuff here, like material success, retirement accounts and shopping and you have to be so uncouth.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:26:25 (GMT)
From: AJW
Email: None
To: Brian Smith
Subject: Brian, let's get serious for a moment...
Message:

...Where do you get your olive oil from?

Anth, well we go off to Tuscany every year because we've got this friend who's got this beautiful blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah goes clear after about blah blah blah blah blah blah couldn't get it on the plane blah blah blah blah blah blah frightfully funny.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:35:04 (GMT)
From: Brian Smith
Email: None
To: AJW
Subject: I get mine at Bi-Mart, I paid 4 bucks for the
Message:

exclusive lifetime membership, the membership fee keeps out the riffraff you know

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:36:19 (GMT)
From: AJW
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: An invitation to Sazyou.
Message:

Hi Sazyou

First of all, I’m fortunate to have the most wonderful family. I’ve been married for thiry one years to a funny, creative, loving, brilliant woman(who I met before living in the ashram, by the way). We have two smart, sweet, strong and beautiful grown-up kids who actually – knock on wood – like and love us and enjoy our and each other’s company.

Sazyou, you sound like one of a dying species, and you're very a valuable member of your group. You give it credibility.

I wonder if you have the courage to discuss your master and his teachings with me? You're the one experiencing 'knowledge', doing it right. I've obviously got incredibly confused somewhere down the line.

Don't you think a little open, free, friendly discussion could perhaps close the gap a little?

Whaddya say Sazyou? That's what these forums are for. So people can discuss things?

Are you up for it? I'm happy to answer any questions of yours, if you'll answer a few of mine.

Do you accept?

First question, what is your opinion of what Michael Dettmers wrote about Maharaji's shennanigans? (If you haven't read it, follow the link at the top of the page to Ex-Premie Org. It's got a link on the Home Page.)

Anth treasurer of the debating society.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:07:15 (GMT)
From: Hal
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later- I'm free
Message:

Hi Sazyou,

Sorry if the comment I made earlier was offensive but you did come across to me as awfuly smug you know.

I probably would have come over in the same way too a year ago , so I do understand your perspective.

I never considered myself as belonging to a cult. However, one important definition of a cult is that it is an autocratic organisation where the followers have no say in how it is run. Maha is a tyrannical dictator who doesn't even answer polite questions from his followers or wavering followers. He won't even allow you after 28 yrs to express your own honest experience of this fabulous 'knowledge' . Why? Because you can't be trusted not to screw up and say the wrong thing.

I believe that you do enjoy the practice of the techniques, why not, I can still enjoy them too if I so choose. I even understand that maha inspires you through his discourses to persue the dream of higher consciousness.

However , many memebers of other cults find their leaders inspiring. Moonies, Sai babaists, evangelists, Scientologists and all the other ists , no different. They too do not acknowledge that they are hooked into cults.

Seems that your particular cult is more low profile and low key than some of the others. Maha is certainly careful nowadays not to present himself in a messianic context (but you insiders know the big non secret that he's still the LORD isn't he ?)

You mention very proudly that your all right Jack, happy marriage , good business ,'normal ' external life. You perhaps think that this means you can't be in a cult? Scientolgists and Moonies , Mormons etc are full to the brim with rich , middle class members , so what?

I know that I can't talk you out of your affiliation with your 'non-cult', so that's not my aim. As someone said , if you are happy with it , bully for you. Have you got the t- shirt 'I am NEVER in denial ?'

Krishnamurti had some good words to say

' You are accustomed to authority, or to the atmosphere of authority, which you think will lead you to spirituality. You think and hope that another can, by his extraordinary powers - a miracle- transport you to this eternal realm of freedom which is Happiness. Your whole outlook on life is based on that authority. '

More...

'Organisations cannot make you free. No man from outside can make you free; nor can organised worship, nor the immolation of yourself for a cause, make you free; nor can forming yourself into an organisation, nor throwing yourself into works, make you free. You use a typewriter to write letters , but you do not place it on an alter and worship it. But that is what you are doing when organisations become your chief concern. ' How many members are there in it ?'

and.. ' Again you have the idea that only certain people hold the key to the Kingdom of Happiness. No one holds it. No one has the authority to hold that key. That key is your own self, and in the development , the purification and in the incorruptibilty of that self alone , is the Kingdom of Eternity .'

You may think you are strong in the fortress of servitude to Maha but he has you caught in weak dependency. What if most of the exposés that this website contains are true? Would that not matter to you ? Premies always say that they have had so many great experiences , how could he not be a true master. But Rumi said something which implied that if one is sincere then even following an imposter could bring that person good spiritual results. I think it's you who have created all the good stuff in your life. One day you may realise that , drop the guru and experience real freedom , but then again maybe you're stuck in a cult for life.

It's your choice whether or not you remove the blinkers and let go of the fairytale.

Enjoy the happy clapping.

Hal

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:25:10 (GMT)
From: janet
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later--me too
Message:

were you in the ashram? were you a housemother? were you at IHQ? did you break your vows while in the ashram? did you have sex there? smoke? drink? get high? get pregnant?
did you go to millennium? soul rush? did you abort an education to do service?
did you pay off the astrodome debt? did you ever see your heard earned money get sucked up in one visit by someone grabbing it for maharji instead of what it was being saved for?
did you leave the ashram due to a relationship? a child? marriage? did you get married because maharaji did?
did you break a marriage to move back in after you moved out? did you abandon children to do it? a spouse? friendships? family?
did you surrender and shut out your own inner warnings, in order to follow agya? did you supress conflict? squelch intelligent discussion? dismiss emotional reactions? silence other's concerns? have no patience for confusion? difference? oppositions?
did you believe that The World was illusory? Maya? did you believe that material desires were not to be indulged in? that everything was for maharaji, not for you?
did you get sick at DECA gold plating toilets? violate the EPA and OSHA laws about toxic waste with not a pang of conscience?
for 28 years you have been admiring a man who has been exposed to be a hopeless alcoholic, a drug user, a smoker,a sexaholic, an adulterer, a hit and run committer of vehicular manslaughter, a hypocrit, a liar, an evader of the laws of nations, an embezzeler of millions of dollars and a self promoting fraud who does not even practice the very Knowledge he purports to teach. He no longer teaches anything at all.
there is nothing left to him now but maintenance of a deadly, top heavy, desperate grift. the bigger they come, the harder they fall. the bigger the front, the bigger the rear.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:50:22 (GMT)
From: AJW
Email: None
To: janet
Subject: janet, we should...
Message:

...put this post on the back of our EPO business cards.

Brilliant. See my post above, it would have taken me ages to get there, but I hope she's up for a bit of discussion anyway.

Not one of these premie jerks who come here, read their speech, then run away because they can't take the 'hate'.

What a strange perspective they have.

Anth who by the way has a great consulting business that has been running successfully for the past 18 years working all over Europe. Also, we only eat Mozerella made from Buffallo milk, not cow milk. And if you don't go to Tuscany to get your olive oil yourself, forget it. You know the stuff in the stores is 80% Spanish, even if it's got 'Extra .....blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:23:55 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: janet
Subject: Well sazyou....
Message:

Janet, your questions were very powerful. Great job.

Here are a few more. Sazyou, how much time have you devoted to reading this site? How much of the site have you read? Have you read the 'Truth About Maharaji' on Sir Dave's website? Do you know that Mahatma Jagdeo was permitted to travel the world and molest children, even after Maharaji and those who ran the cult were aware of his behavior?

Are you close to Maharaji? Where do you sit at events? Were you or are you responsible for running organizational activities? What did you or do you do? Were you ever an instructor? How much money do you donate to EV and/or Maharaji every year? If you are so proud of what you do and about your familial situation, why are you posting anonymously? Is sonofa, who posted above, one of your children?

I am not one of the people who believes it is my responsibility to convince premies they are deluded. I come here to speak the truth about my own past in the cult -- good and bad -- and to support others who are in the process of or have left the cult. The information is here for you to take or leave.

Instead of asking us to prove why you are deluded sazyou, why don't you try answering the questions posed to you in this thread and then we'll talk some more. Your replies will be very educational for all of us, and maybe even for you.

Marianne

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:43:05 (GMT)
From: JohnT
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: OK
Message:

explain to me again how I?m deluded and emotionally crippled and am part of a cult?

You have followed a lie, and made it your truth.

Also, you seem deeply and repulsively selfish and solipsist, as there is no indication you have a thought or care for the casualties caused by the things you worship.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:15:41 (GMT)
From: Abi
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: SF
Message:

By the way I know lots of SF writers. What is your name? I'd like to read your work.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:01:11 (GMT)
From: Hal
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: My , my , aren't we smug . nt
Message:

nt

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:54:12 (GMT)
From: Abi
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: 28 years later
Message:

I guess following 'The Lord of the Universe' must have helped with the science fiction...

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:39:08 (GMT)
From: salam
Email: None
To: Sazyou
Subject: gaga agagag
Message:

ga aga ga ga ga.

Oh you sound so cute. No I don't feel like spoiling your well put life or your post, so leave me alone cause I hate rawat and anything to do with him including you. Bet you you will contribute $800 to Amaroo too and get a front set, just don't sit on the left side of the row, cause that's were the shit coming from.

Have you been sent here by EV?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:31:20 (GMT)
From: DeProGram Anand Ji
Email: not given
To: Everyone
Subject: Live and Let Live
Message:

I say let those who claim they are happy with M be happy with their claim. If it's lie they are living they will know it at their core. My advise to them is this, ' to thine own self be true'. My own experience is that M played on my hopes and deepest aspirations. A stubborn belief that some how the world could be transformed into somthing more ideal. Letting go of that belief and learning to accept life on it's own terms has been a long painful journey towards emotional maturity. I wanted life to be one continueous orgasm, I wanted to live happily ever after in M's three ring circus Utopian fantasy. He was the dream weaver and I was under his spell. But in his drama, the role he played became a means to another end. Not establishing Peace on Earth as he declared he would, but satisfing his insatiable desires for wealth, power and luxury. If you as a premie are sincerely satisfied with what has become of his mission and your role in it then so be it. I just hope that you are being honest with yourself. And frankly I doubt that you are.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:43:07 (GMT)
From: Aussi Ji
Email: None
To: salam
Subject: Go for the jugular salam
Message:

jjjjjj

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 06:49:34 (GMT)
From: salam
Email: None
To: Aussi Ji
Subject: Can not do that
Message:

Sounds like a lady (I think). Plus am going through rehab, no bashing premies, do not know how long it's gonna last but.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:02:33 (GMT)
From: AJW
Email: None
To: salam
Subject: salam
Message:

salam,

You make me laugh this Saturday morning.

How's it going? I had a crazy day last Monday. I was arrested on the way to work. Ha ha ha.

Anth the strippenkartjefraud

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 14:09:36 (GMT)
From: salam
Email: None
To: AJW
Subject: That's what you get for selling old cars
Message:

you pommy ripoff merchant that doesn't know which March is he talking about. Well I hope that lawyer that run away with your wife was there to get you out, or was she arrested too? sheesh. Better ask for you last post on f5.

This is costing me money getting all this info on IRCC, any donations?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index