Maharaji in Oxnard
One and only one way to be happy - with him and knowledge.
Best of the Forum Index

Jim -:- Maharaji in Oxnard -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 14:20:16 (GMT)

__ Helen -:- Maharaji in Oxnard -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 22:35:10 (GMT)

__ Way -:- Warning to Jim -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:51:28 (GMT)

__ Joe -:- Maharaji is a LIAR, but what is Turner? -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:30:06 (GMT)

__ __ AJW -:- Turner's in a mess Joe. -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 11:15:04 (GMT)

__ Sandy -:- Jim is hedging his bets -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:06:22 (GMT)

__ __ Steve Quint -:- You're Joking, Right? -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 21:24:44 (GMT)

__ __ __ Sandy -:- Yes and No, sincerely -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:36:40 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Steve Quint -:- Sincerity Without Humility Is Meaningless -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 16:48:39 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Michael Dettmers -:- Don't abuse sincerity, Sandy -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 16:31:17 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ Kelly -:- Hi Michael. Talking of drivel... -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 18:21:32 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Michael Dettmers -:- The package has not yet arrived (nt) -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 22:39:47 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ bill -:- Yes and No, sincerely -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:12:13 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Jim -:- See? You did it again! -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:50:48 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ baz -:- plot -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:51:01 (GMT)

__ __ cq -:- Jim is part of the divine plan too, Sandy ... -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 20:39:34 (GMT)

__ __ AJW -:- Thus spake the Lard. -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 20:31:50 (GMT)

__ __ JHB -:- Sincerity? Don't make me puke! -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:48:36 (GMT)

__ __ __ Sandy -:- There some bad in the best of us -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:42:13 (GMT)

__ __ Francesca -:- Don't get your hopes up Sandy -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:09:40 (GMT)

__ Kelly -:- Maharaji in Oxnard -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 15:40:19 (GMT)

__ __ Marianne -:- Revisionism -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:20:29 (GMT)

__ __ __ Kelly -:- Revisionism? This is Abridged Too Far! -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:20:22 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Marianne -:- Legal misrepresentation??? -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:36:34 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ LL.B at the Bar -:- Legal opinion misrepresentation??? -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:33:57 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- Greetings Catweasel--damages for cult fraud -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:11:18 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Brendan Murphy -:- Such a long Bow you draw!! -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:35:48 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- Where do you practice? -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 13:30:01 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Brendan Murphy -:- Where do you practice? -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 14:42:41 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- Feel the need to squelch me, do ya Brendan? -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 15:09:54 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Brendan Murphy -:- I Feel the need to ask for the truth Marianne -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 15:41:01 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- What are 'punitative' damages, pray tell? nt -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 15:50:08 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- Legal opinion misrepresentation??? -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:16:16 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Brendan Murphy -:- Legal opinion misrepresentation??? -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:54 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ Kelly -:- Legal misrepresentation??? -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:51:22 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- Does it identify who does the editing? -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:01:08 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Ian Dury -:- Dunrite Productions -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 21:29:05 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Patrick Conlon -:- EV spin doctors are secret -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:26:08 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- Oh, the words are VERY important to this lawyer -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:42:33 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Joe -:- Maharaji's 'satsang' has always been edited -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 20:01:41 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Joy -:- Maharaji's 'satsang' has always been edited -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 22:37:58 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ cq -:- call it 'ongoing revisionism' - -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 21:13:26 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Patrick Conlon -:- Marianne, Fraudulent misrepresentation -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:53:50 (GMT)

__ __ __ Sandy -:- Revisionism -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:44:12 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Lurker #27 -:- Revisionism -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:54:52 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- Revisionism -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:17:43 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Lurker#27 -:- gerry - different strokes. . . NT -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:27:59 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ Sandy -:- Revisionism -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:02:28 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- What you're doing, Sandy, depends on one thing -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 23:38:37 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Sandy -:- My motive is not based on fooling anyone. (nt) -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:44:27 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Mickey the Pharisee -:- My motive is not based on fooling anyone. -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 05:00:51 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Lurker #27 -:- Revisionism -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:24:01 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Sandy -:- Revisionism -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:40:14 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Lurker #27 -:- Sandy - one last concept! -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 21:37:17 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Sandy -:- To L27 -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:49:11 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- And what a dumb concept it is! -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 23:48:49 (GMT)

__ Way -:- No, Rawat, you're not even the filament -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 15:30:18 (GMT)

__ __ Brian Smith -:- I absolutely love this post, as the truth always -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 07:38:59 (GMT)

__ __ bill -:- blacklight, insane fuck-nt -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:18:56 (GMT)

__ __ Disculta -:- Grateful, but not to him -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 15:47:11 (GMT)

__ toby -:- Maharaji in Oxnard -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 15:16:25 (GMT)

__ __ Sandy -:- Maharaji in Oxnard -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 15:56:02 (GMT)

__ __ __ baz -:- four techniques -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 20:41:21 (GMT)

__ __ __ JHB -:- Appropriate responses to assistance -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 23:01:15 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Sandy -:- To JHB -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:57:04 (GMT)

__ __ __ Joy -:- Maharaji in That Fancy Aston Martin Has a Pricetag -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 22:52:18 (GMT)

__ __ __ Tim G -:- Cul-de Sac...Sandy -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:53:07 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Sandy -:- Tim -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:58:38 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- Wake Up you gas bag... -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:04:48 (GMT)

__ __ __ Way -:- To Sandy -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:40:54 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Sandy -:- To Way -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:56:49 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ baz -:- To Way -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 21:11:59 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ janet -:- how does showing or telling people -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 09:40:28 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Sandy -:- Well, since you put it like that.... -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:45:47 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ Way -:- no, no, no, those are not options! -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:21:27 (GMT)

__ __ __ Jean-Paul -:- m is superficial -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:08:59 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Francesca -:- Very true Jean-Paul -- great post! (OT) -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:35:13 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ Jean-Paul -:- no need saviour -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 20:57:31 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Disculta -:- exactement Jean-Paul! -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:44:32 (GMT)

__ __ __ gerry -:- You buttwipe Sandy -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:08:31 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Jim -:- Oh Stoooonoooooorrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!! -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 23:55:22 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ JohnT -:- That's my recillection too, Jim -nt- -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:45:32 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- What exactly do you remember, John? (nt) -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 20:00:03 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ JohnT -:- Not a lot, I'm sorry to say -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 22:08:25 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Sandy -:- Buttwipes get rid of shit, you need 'em pal -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:19:29 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ janet -:- animals don't use toilet paper, and only -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:00:56 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- Having a little relapse, sheep? -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:29:06 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Sandy -:- Having a little relapse, sheep? -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:43:56 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ toby -:- high sandy -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 11:35:56 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ baz -:- well said -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:34:05 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- baz, you do know... -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 16:35:31 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ baz -:- reply sent to wrong message -:- Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 20:47:50 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- Yeah, yer right, sheep, can't beat your logic, -:- Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:59:13 (GMT)

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 14:20:16 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Maharaji in Oxnard
Message:

Here's the latest Hamster Chatter from Oxnard this month:

Amongst all the things that happen in this life, what is the most important? That one that really addresses my existence? Knowing quite well that we come from the same magical dirt, and have the same molecules, as an eggplant. But instead of a purple thing hanging off of a little plant, here a moving, thinking existence was created. A body, eyes, mind, brain, ears. Which can think, feel, touch, see, experience and enjoy.
And what a palette! Doubt and clarity. My goodness, those are incredibly strong things. Opposite to each other, but both, incredibly strong. And with it, a bunch of paint brushes, lots of paint, and an empty canvas. Of course, our first thought is, 'Why do I have to paint? Why can't I just sit here?” Fine. You don't have to paint. You can sit there and look at this white canvas all your life.

Or you could say, 'I'm just going to do what I think I should do.” That's painting by numbers. It makes your life easy, and it works really well, so far you don't show your painting to anyone. Because the other person may say, 'Hey, I did the same thing!”

But think about how incredibly unique you are. You have two eyes, I have two eyes. You have lips, I have lips. You have teeth, I have teeth. You have a nose, I have a nose. So, what's the difference? There are incredible variations, in a combination so subtle that you look different than I do. Nothing is alike. No two sunsets are alike. No two waves are alike, no two snowflake are alike. There are infinite variations.

So here you are. Unique. With an existence to be enjoyed, to be fulfilled. And when I say, 'Enjoy,” I'm not talking about party time. The enjoyment that comes from being fulfilled is different. Being fulfilled means knowing from your heart when that gratitude starts to sing. Your heart dances, and you don't know why.

A long time ago - this is one example I used to give back in the '70's - people would start comparing me to God. 'Are you God?' - that's what they would ask. 'No, I'm not God.' 'So, what are you?' And this is the analogy I used to give. Imagine a big power station. There are big turbines running in there, generating power, and then there are the cables going out from the power station, going to the different transformers, and from those transformers, distributed further. They go into distribution centers and they're distributed even more. Then they go into your city, into your little area and then into your community, and finally that power comes to your house, and, through the wiring in your house, reaches your little outlet.

And from that little outlet it goes through the wires and into the bulb. In the bulb, there is a filament, and when the power goes into that, it lights up. And I would say that's me - the filament. I'm not the power station. The filament is the thinnest part of the whole equation. It is so thin that when the electricity goes through that filament, it lights it up. Whatever it may be, without that filament, there is no light. And if light is what you want, then that's how that is made possible.

[What kind of an answer is that??]

That which is so complicated is made so simple, and Knowledge is the most incredible response to the cry of that heart. Something said, 'I want to be fulfilled.” And someone said, 'Here. Here is a way you can be.” Of all the understandings, that one understanding has to dance. Of all the things that you do in your life, and will do in your life, there will be one that is the most important. And if it is incredibly simple, as simple as taking a breath, then let it be.

So be in that joy. Be content. And then, let it be. Don't make life a mystery that it isn't. Don't make life complicated, which it isn't. It is a very simple rhythm of existence, of coming, of going, of being here. And in this 'being here' is everything. There is you. There is your understanding, there is your capacity to love. There is your capacity to appreciate.

Confusion, believe me, is contagious. There's never been a shortage of it. Once, I was watching this spoof video of mistakes that people have made. And one of them was of a guy who gets the football and starts running. He is really running. He looks behind him, and there's nobody chasing him. He gets to the other end, and he throws the ball down, jumps up and it's like, 'Yes! This is my moment of glory.” And the whole audience is looking at him in total disbelief. He got the ball; he ran with it. There's only one small technicality. He ran the wrong way.

So here you are. This is your moment of glory. You've got the ball. What are you going to do? Some people will ask, 'Is this really a ball? And if this is a ball, how come I've got it?” This is what confusion can do. 'How come I've got it? I wonder what I did in my last lunch break to end up with this ball. '

So what are you going to do? That which doesn't want you to have the ball is tearing down the field, running to get the ball. It's called time; a powerful thing. Nobody has been able to stop the tackle of time. It's strong. It's powerful. But so are you, because you have the ball. Somebody is saying, 'Run that way.' And you're thinking, 'How do I know that's the right way?” The coach is saying, 'Go. Run. Run.” It would have been nice if you had paid attention so you would know which is your side and which is the other side. But now, it's, 'Help, I've got the ball! What do I do with it? This is too much. I don't want the ball. Oh, my god, somebody take it!”

And the big force is coming, with big, eight-foot-wide shoulders, making Popeye look like a little fly. The pounding is heard yards away, the earth is shaking. Those little things that you used to be able to do so easily. That's the earth shaking. I see it in other people, I see it in myself. My eyesight used to be like binoculars. Now, it's not. We think, 'Oh, I just need to get glasses.” To fix it. Maybe it's, 'Oh, my back hurts.' And I take couple of pills. To fix it.

Are you going to run, or are you going to stand in one place and say, 'Oh, my god - what am I going to do with this ball? If I knew it was going to be like this, I would have never picked this game!” But you've got it, so do something.

Then somebody comes and says, 'Look. It's okay. Gather your strength. That big tackler, called time, was always coming. Don't be worried by it. It may seem closer, but it was always running at this speed.' That's one thing that's good about time: it really doesn't accelerate. It stays at the same pace. And what you've got to do is keep your pace clean. Use the tools you've got. That enthusiasm. Those things that seem so tender to you.

Try feeling. Try opening this heart, and, with both hands, try hugging existence. Do you know what that's like? To embrace the advice of the coach who says, 'Don't be so afraid.' To embrace the advice of the Master? And even though whatever the Master gives you is free, the Master's advice is never free. Because if you follow his advice, it will take everything you've got. It will require you to take every moment that you have and put it to use in that enjoyment, in that perfection. Not just bits and pieces of this lifetime, but this whole lifetime.


People might say, 'But what about all the years that have gone by?” No, the day when you awaken is the day you begin to live. The day you form the alliance with the heart is the day you begin to live. That's when the dance happens.

So embrace this life. Embrace this magic. All of it - it's yours. You've got the ball. Run, and score. People come who have run the wrong way. But the game isn't over yet, You've still got the ball. You can still run with it. Run to your heart, and acknowledge your heart. The living will experience the living and there is nothing more living than this breath. There is nothing more living than this heart.

Let the Master show you the shortcuts, so that that which was destined for time can become timeless. That's the quality of the heart. That's what Knowledge is all about. Somebody felt the chain of time, felt the shackles of doubt on their feet, and their heart cried, 'I want to be free.” Other people, may say, 'Oh, yes. We know how you can be more free. We'll chain you more, and then we'll take off a couple of the chains so then you'll feel freer.' If you say, 'But what about the original chains?', they will reply, ' Well, so far you just perceive that you are freer, that's good enough.' No, it's not. Freedom is freedom. It is not something to think about but something to know. It's all there for you to turn within, to accept. To accept the challenge of the heart. And to run. To run with dignity. Not tumbling over yourself, not tripping all over the place. Even if you fall down, don't worry. Grab that ball and run again. Do you best in being conscious. Do your best in being alive. Everything else, somehow, will fall into place.

What's going to happen to you this year? I know one thing that could happen. You could be really happy. That's the possibility that you have been presented with. Take it. Of all the things that might happen, that's possible. And so, make it happen. You've got the ball. Be alive. What more is there?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 22:35:10 (GMT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: all
Subject: Maharaji in Oxnard
Message:

It's interesting how M sets up the game. He paints the picture that there is one and only one way to be happy--with him and knowledge.

And how life without knowledge is so big and scary.

He's a damn fundamentalist. It's his way or the highway.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:51:28 (GMT)
From: Way
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Warning to Jim
Message:

There is a post to you from shp about hedging your bets, a few posts below. You should take some deep breaths before you read it.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:30:06 (GMT)
From: Joe
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Maharaji is a LIAR, but what is Turner?
Message:

I think even premies have to admit that Maharaji lies like a rug.

I listened to his crap in ther 70s and 80s and he NEVER said he was a 'filament.' He DID say he was 'greater than God,' he DID say he was 'THE SUPERIOR POWER IN PERSON,' He DID say he was equivalent to Jesus Christ and Krishna. And I NEVER heard him even ONCE say 'I AM NOT GOD.' He always did a coy wink, wink, trip letting the premies know that's who he was, while at the same time, dressing up as Krishna, having us kiss his feet, and raising not one murmur of protest when he was called 'Lord of the Universe.'

So, Maharaji lies about who he is, or who he thinks he is, he lies about what he did in the past as a 'Master,' he also lies in his personal life by allowing someone else to take the rap when he killed somebody in a car accident, and he also lies when he pretends to be this conservative family man, when at the same time he has a mistress, has sex with his devotees, and takes drugs.

The fact that people like Turner can accept all this and make excuses for him, also says something about people like Turner. Is it delusion, or outright dishonesty? Clearly it's just plain lying when it comes to Maharaji. But what about Turner?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 11:15:04 (GMT)
From: AJW
Email: None
To: Joe
Subject: Turner's in a mess Joe.
Message:

He's devoted his life to the Lord. He's sincere.

And, as the Lord is infinitely wise and merciful, he wouldn't let Turner spend all those years, believing he was giving himself to the creator when really he was pissing into the wind with the rest of us, would he?

This is the big bit of his life that he's scared to look at.

An image of a person in a room comes to mind. Someone has robbed him, then told him to sit on a chair and not get up or he'll be shot. The robber then leaves, leaving Turner on the chair, thinking there's someone still behind him ready to shoot. Turner sits and sits and sits. People come to the window and bang on it, telling Turner there's nobody there.

But you can't fool Turner. He saw the robber. He saw the gun. He doesn't want to get shot. He's not moving.

The years go by...

You've got to feel sorry for the guy.

And what if he's one of the mugs who's taken out a massive loan to pay the latest installment on a gold toilet seat for the private jet?

Pass the kleenex. Maybe we should have a collection for him.

Anth so happy to have escaped.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 16:06:22 (GMT)
From: Sandy
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Jim is hedging his bets
Message:

Yep.

Jim Heller, arch-nemesis of Prem Pal Singh Rawat, is doing service to Maharaji by posting his words here and he knows it.
Of course, it is all presented under the guise of scrutinizing and eviscerating the discourse. But Jim knows, perhaps better than most, that even to present Maharaji's words in this setting is also service to him, for so many will be exposed to the message.

Subconscious action by Mr. Heller? Perhaps. But when someone reproduces the words of Maharaji and sends them out to hundreds if not thousands of listeners, it is indeed service, even if the apparent purpose is to ridicule. You knew that, didn't you Jim?

Ever the doubtful, overintellectual, cosmopolitan, jaded, surface partisan for the oppressed minority, you still aren't sure yourself, are you Jim? So you post his words here and it is indeed service. Out of all the people who read your post, I bet at least someone will be touched by whatever sincerity and truth exists in those words, despite all the bad news and bad everything that has happened along the way, plus your own spin.

Very clever, Jim.

Sandy

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 21:24:44 (GMT)
From: Steve Quint
Email: the_avenger55@hotmail.com
To: Sandy
Subject: You're Joking, Right?
Message:

Please tell me you're joking. Please tell me the truth.

Steve

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:36:40 (GMT)
From: Sandy
Email: None
To: Steve Quint
Subject: Yes and No, sincerely
Message:

He may be posting Maharaji's words thinking he's doing it to dissect it before his audience or let the others tear it apart, as well the words could be.

But even if a drunk heroin addict thief with AIDS lying in the gutter in his own feces can lift his finger and point a seeker to go within to find the truth, the power of that direction surpasses the condition of the pointer. Therefore, I say that whether Jim realizes it or not, he is serving the spreading of Knowledge by printing and sending Mahraji's words out on the internet, even here. For even if one person feels something from it and acts on that feeling, I beleive that goes on Jim's dance card, so to speak.

I find it interesting that as long as I am talking the ex talk, I'm cool with most here, but as soon as I say something in objectivity that does not reek of anti-Maharaji, I get reviled.
Too bad.

I just got this in my e-mail from lightsmith.com

Some here may relate to it:

Subject:
UPDATE from Lightsmith
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 17:07:30 -0600
From: 'LIGHTSMITH.COM'
To: chris@lightsmith.com

Hi y'all,

Greetings to you from here in Minnesota, the THROAT chakra of North America (cough). At least that's some distinction besides setting records as reaching some of the coldest temperatures in the United States and being a place you don't want to visit in the winter. Here we are almost at the end of January, the presidential election is finally over (I think), and we're zipping through just another ordinary month of non-stop personal restructuring and intense global transformation. Yee-hah. Perhaps you're thinking 'I've been working so hard for THIS?'.
Ah, well, the best is yet to come!

This update brings you notice of a few more additions to the Lightsmith site, notably a new page of response from our friends in Spirit and also a message for these times. The new questions presented at the last channeling include comments about what has been a busy dream time for many, a perspective on underground networks and Lemurians, and an explanation of the astral plane. The monthly message is a particularly direct one, and I am going to include it at the end of this note because some people on our list do not have easy access to the web at this time (mail is received on mailstations and such). You can read it here or
check out everything on the Lightsmith site at /www.lightsmith.com.

Before I add the channeling, I wanted to add a few thoughts of my own. The astral energies are lobbying hard for your attention right now. You will likely be presented with an opportunity to polarize with someone or something. DON'T GO THERE. That's how you are pulled into giving your energy to a part of consciousness that doesn't know how to die a peaceful death. You can witness the energy shortage and the panic in the old, controlling structures. In California, it's playing out in a grand
metaphor for all to see. It's occurring throughout the physical and astral levels, so stay conscious of what you are doing with your energies. Don't give them away. Don't even give them your fear if that's up for you right now. Project NOTHING onto another and own every feeling as yours. Process everything as your own opportunity to clear, expand, and move into another reality. Release your attachments and step OUT of the old. That is the main challenge of these first months of 2001. This message was also articulated in the new year's channeling. I'll have a
transcript of that channeling posted in the next few days, so please check back.

I would also like to let you know of a couple of events Michele and I will be doing here in Minnesota. We will be speaking and facilitating a process of alignment with two different spiritual communities. On Sunday, February 18th we will be at the Agapé service which is held at the Center for Performing Arts in Minneapolis. On the following Sunday we will be in Duluth for the Sunday service of the Lake Superior Interfaith Community Church. Please join us if you can.

As always, we appreciate sharing this amazing adventure with you, and we love to hear from you either in a personal e-mail or from your questions. Many blessings...........

Chris

Here is what our Spirit friends had to say:

'Some of what we would like to say in this time we have perhaps said before. However, because of what is taking place in the collective consciousness we would like to reiterate it in some ways and offer a little more direction to people in terms of how to work with what we are speaking of.'

'There is a very strong contraction in the field right now. The
contraction is not one where it is felt just because of winter or the physical experience, but it is a contraction of duality. Duality in the matrix itself is pulling itself into a great tension, rather like the poles are widening. As it does so, those people who are either on one side or the other feel a greater and greater emotional attachment to those places in their consciousness where they are attached to one side or the other by agreement and by design within duality with even greater
tension with the pole. So even greater relationship in their own
unconscious with what has been projected outward and not owned. The nature of duality is a disowning of one aspect, projecting it, and then creating tension with it so there is a charge formed that is a substitute for life.'

'There is only one way out of the separation that is growing in terms of its polarity, and it is not through either of the poles. It is to just step out of that field completely. Most people who have so intimately identified themselves with this as life see this as death to do this. It is actually a step into real life rather than the false illusionary substitute of life. But it does at times feel that you are giving up what is known and familiar, and stepping into the new matrix which is already formed and is ready to receive anyone who wishes to step into it. It is not like it is just a step, it is moving beyond duality. It is
saying 'no more, I do not wish to do this, I do not wish to play in this arena of separation, of fighting, of drama, of duality where there is charge, but not life.'

'One of the ways to begin to do this is to recognize how much stress, how much pain, how much struggle, how much disturbance, how much imbalance, how much grayness, and how much death there is in this place. Recognize it, name it. Allow that it has been your experience, and also acknowledge that there is another experience just beyond the veil. You can use an image of walking out of a building across a bridge, parting a veil, opening a door, walking through a door, up a stairs and into another place. Use the visualization as your meditation of moving beyond this place, however it looks to you and whatever is your image. Step
very deliberately into this new arena, this new place. Gradually, what is holding you in duality will loosen. You will begin to feel less and less of a pull to be there, or to play there, or to remain there.'

'Know that this other place is ready and that you can be there, and you will begin to learn how to be there. It does not operate the same, it is not a polar region. It is a region where all who are present begin to form circles or places in which all can be present and co-create. It is joyful and playful, and it is very creative for that is its nature. There are currents of creation within it that carry intention through to form and manifestation. It is abundant, and it is for all who choose to be part of it, to step into it, to open their root chakras, release survival fears and open to life. We have spoken of it before. It is ready, it is all ready, and you can step into it. Use the visualizations in your meditation times. You will start to feel what it feels like,
you'll know that it is present, and it will be easier to leave the duality matrix that is now beginning to disassemble from within.'

'That is our message, and we encourage as many as can hear this,
perceive this, and recognize this to begin to do it. You will meet others in this other place who have already gone before you. They will assist you, they will be welcoming you, and there will become a new dance of creation. Those in duality who choose to remain attached to their place within it will not perceive this dance, but there will become manifest forms being created out of this new place. These will show up in life. Those in duality will try to discredit them and not make room for them, and yet they will be so wondrous and so alive that those in life and those young people who have not been totally woven into duality will grab a hold of them and grow. Those in duality will not understand how, because they are not funding them so how are they
growing and how do they have life.'

'These questions will begin to open the whole structure of duality. Many will feel like they are losing their minds or going crazy. They will try to get even more control. These next few years will be this drama. Those who have already left duality will not even be much affected by what is happening. Those within duality will feel as if their world is wrenching apart. This will continue. You have a number of years where this will be in transition. Choose now and enjoy these years as the creative energies of creation herself inform you, give you life, abundance, and joy to play with.'

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 16:48:39 (GMT)
From: Steve Quint
Email: the_avenger55@hotmail.com
To: Sandy
Subject: Sincerity Without Humility Is Meaningless
Message:

Sandy, I feel like a friend because of prior communication. I'm also concerned about you. Your posts exhibit signs of schizophrenia in my opinion. I'm not a doctor but as a friend I can suggest you get professional help. I know that rawat has damaged people's thinking, including my own. It can be fixed but it takes humility.

If you are sincere and open-minded, please email me and we can continue this off-line.

Steve

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 16:31:17 (GMT)
From: Michael Dettmers
Email: dettmers@gylanix.com
To: Sandy
Subject: Don't abuse sincerity, Sandy
Message:

Sandy,

It’s clear from your posts that you have a problem with Jim. You do not enhance you credibility as a discerning thinker nor as a fair fighter, with me at least, by suggesting that Jim is helping Maharaji by posting excerpts of his speeches on the Forum. In my opinion, nothing discredits Maharaji more than reading what he has said, not only in the distant past, but especially the drivel he is offering up today.

Michael

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 18:21:32 (GMT)
From: Kelly
Email: None
To: Michael Dettmers
Subject: Hi Michael. Talking of drivel...
Message:

I sent the package, has it arrived yet?
I agree with you, there is nothing more revealing about M than the drivel that issues from his own mouth. But, I must say that your revelations on this site come a close second!! for which, thanks. I hope you've got more up your sleeve.??
Love Kelly

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 22:39:47 (GMT)
From: Michael Dettmers
Email: dettmers@gylanix.com
To: Kelly
Subject: The package has not yet arrived (nt)
Message:

nt

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:12:13 (GMT)
From: bill
Email: None
To: Sandy
Subject: Yes and No, sincerely
Message:

Hello Sandy,

Choosing freinds and choosing those whom you listen to for input
requires discretion. People will ensnare in words and in thier creative delusion, seem smart and worthwhile.
rawats little talk is loaded with fraud and it is up to the reader to be able to see that.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:50:48 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Sandy
Subject: See? You did it again!
Message:

I find it interesting that as long as I am talking the ex talk, I'm cool with most here, but as soon as I say something in objectivity that does not reek of anti-Maharaji, I get reviled.

What you do with words is shameless. This time it's 'objectivity'.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:51:01 (GMT)
From: baz
Email: None
To: sandy
Subject: plot
Message:

think you may be losing the plot sandy - lets keep it simple
baz

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 20:39:34 (GMT)
From: cq
Email: None
To: Sandy
Subject: Jim is part of the divine plan too, Sandy ...
Message:

- though have you ever wondered why the divine plan is making it ever easier to denounce Maharaji as the lying fraud he'd destined to deny being for the rest of his natural ... ?

Phew, talk about karma!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 20:31:50 (GMT)
From: AJW
Email: None
To: Sandy
Subject: Thus spake the Lard.
Message:

Hi Sandy,

Maharaji doesn't have a message. He just wants you to help satisfy his desires.

He recommends you dedicate your life to him, concentrate on him, love him, finance him, experience 'him' within, give him credit for the fact that you're breathing (unless he's killed you in a hit and run) think of him at the moment of death, etc.

His words, when read without the hypnotic lull of non-critical devotion (it's not in the words, it's a feeling right?) really are empty, contradictory, simplistic mumbo-jumbo.

He's full of crap. He's not wise at all. He's a spoiled brat who believes his own bullshit.

Anth, who is all about several feelings, but not all at the same time because it makes you ill and you get into trouble.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:48:36 (GMT)
From: JHB
Email: None
To: Sandy
Subject: Sincerity? Don't make me puke!
Message:

Sandy the sincere wrote:-

Out of all the people who read your (Jim's) post, I bet at least someone will be touched by whatever sincerity and truth exists in those (Maharaji's) words.

Sandy,

Is this one of your serious posts???? Sincerity from Maharaji - are you sure?? No - I can't believe your years here have had no effect on your intellect. Listen, Sandy - Maharaji has no sincerity when he speaks. Got it??

BTW the rest of your post was complete and utter bollocks.

John the amazed.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:42:13 (GMT)
From: Sandy
Email: None
To: JHB
Subject: There some bad in the best of us
Message:

And some good in the worst of us.

To lose sight of that is more than I choose to surrender, even if I am repulsed and disgusted by some of the reports and actions I have read about him here.

So what I hear you saying is the exact opposite of what Maharaji and EV say. There I cannot utter a discouraging word, and here I cannot utter an encouraging one, without getting ostracized by the dominant social order.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:09:40 (GMT)
From: Francesca
Email: None
To: Sandy
Subject: Don't get your hopes up Sandy
Message:

It was such insane trash I couldn't read it. At first I thought it was from that vegetable cult guy.

I will pray that pee-pee Rawat never gets Alzheimers, or we are all in for some 'words to remember.'

Yuck!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 15:40:19 (GMT)
From: Kelly
Email: None
To: Jim and all
Subject: Maharaji in Oxnard
Message:

If you think that’s bad, you should hear the un-cut version!!

At the top of this newsletter they say…

“ ….Rather than reproducing selected excerpts, in this issue of Elan we are publishing an abridged and edited version of his talk.”

Having watched the whole thing last night, I was wondering how they would be able to pick anything out of it that might sound half- way decent. The answer is – by editing it of course!! And boy, has it been edited!! Of course all the stuff about Krishna’s gone. He opened with that. If you want to read what he said, it’s in my post below “Maharaji is a Moron”

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:20:29 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Kelly
Subject: Revisionism
Message:

I see that he also says that back in the bad old '70's, he was asked if he was God, and he denied it. Oh yeah, right.

And they also deleted the part about M telling the premies to think about him at the time of death, didn't they?

Very selective and interesting 'editing'.

Marianne

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:20:22 (GMT)
From: Kelly
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Revisionism? This is Abridged Too Far!
Message:

This is NOT Maharaji in Oxnard. This has been edited beyond recognition. I understand now why EV decided to present an edited and abridged version instead of selected excerpts. They could not have found a single excerpt out of the whole mess that would have sounded any good.

When reading through it, I thought. ‘This is not what I remember’, and I only watched it yesterday! So I printed it out and sat in front of the video and compared it. I was shocked…. really shocked.

Ok, they’ve left out all the crass, embarrassing and incoherent bits, including the Krishna stuff. Fair enough, that’s understandable! But, the bits they have kept, have been edited so frequently, a cut about every 8-10 words, and not only that….they have changed words, added words and phrases, corrected his grammar, and paraphrased to such a degree, that there is almost no resemblance to the original.

If I have time later, and if I can bear to watch it again! I’ll do a couple of comparisons. I really do think this is abridged too far!!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:36:34 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Kelly
Subject: Legal misrepresentation???
Message:

I wonder -- that's right, EV attorneys, I said I wonder --- if the 'edited' version of Rotwat's talk that is sent through the mail amounts to a legal misrepresentation of what he actually said? To whom is this distributed, Kelly?

Marianne

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 00:33:57 (GMT)
From: LL.B at the Bar
Email: Ask Bazza
To: Marianne
Subject: Legal opinion misrepresentation???
Message:

I cannot believe the time you wate under the guise of 'legalese ' spouting the irrational to the unknowing. You claim kudos as a legal expert and then spout that pap?
Mis-representation requires an 'injured party' and 'quantifiable damages'.
So someone volunteers their email adress for a free SPAM every day and THEN they claim for damages? On the basis of an edit? That should be big news to every media outlet in the country 'OK you reporters learn your lines , from now on there is no editing!'
How stupid are you? Go back to your welfare cases and your Court duty attorney roles. You know diddley squat about Civil law you imposter!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:11:18 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: LL.B at the Bar
Subject: Greetings Catweasel--damages for cult fraud
Message:

I see you have posted under 2 different names here. That's okay with me. You are wrong on both counts.

I know exactly what I am talking about. Injured party???? Quantifiable damages? Hmmm. I guess you don't read all the posts by people who want to sue because they feel they were fraudulently deprived of funds and assets by the cult. Editing what the Master says might be actionable if it misled someone into giving funds or assets that they would not otherwise have donated had an accurate and complete transcript of his talk been provided. Why delete that stuff about 'think of me at the time of death' and Krishna and Arjuna? Why not send it out for all the premies and aspirants to read?

Go change your litter box, kitty.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:35:48 (GMT)
From: Brendan Murphy
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Such a long Bow you draw!!
Message:

That is crap Marianne and YOU know it. Who is Catweasel? Whose money are YOU going to use to raise this useless trivial nonsense above the palor of your own mind. Bet not yours!
As I said No Injured Parties (on the basis of editing an Email version of a speech - their perogative, their intellectual property); No quantifiable damages.
I thought you had more respect for yourself and your profession than to be spinning that pap under the guise of 'legal opinion'
Don't bother answering -it's embarrassing to see this nonsense .

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 13:30:01 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Brendan Murphy
Subject: Where do you practice?
Message:

Are you an EV attorney? Are you an EV monitor? Do tell.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 14:42:41 (GMT)
From: Brendan Murphy
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Where do you practice?
Message:

Words fail me.EV monitor? Is that like a classroom monitor? Or is it a 17 inch screen? Please get serious. 'EV monitors' in my humble opinion would never communicate with you. Wouldn't they just 'monitor'?
No , I am not an EV attorney. I doubt they even remember my existence. I could be horribly facetious and tell you I practice in my bedroom. The law has many levels of activity doesn't it counsel?
Stop bullshitting Marianne. You are continually grandstanding.Try being yourself.....
PS: I'd say this bugs some people even more than you!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 15:09:54 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Brendan Murphy
Subject: Feel the need to squelch me, do ya Brendan?
Message:

You don't like what I say, ignore me. Beyond that, one must consider why you are coming here and making these posts. Are you an ex? A premie?

Your post is sexist. Grandstanding? Me? In comparison to whom? I don't think so.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 15:41:01 (GMT)
From: Brendan Murphy
Email: No, this is not personal
To: Marianne
Subject: I Feel the need to ask for the truth Marianne
Message:

Put simply ,I am of the opinion that YOU are misrepresenting the law.
My post to you is not remotely sexist. How did you conjure that one Counsel?
In comparison to who - others who may well be qualified to comment?.
Grandstanding? - thats what I would call it.
You stop bullshitting!- and I'm off your case.
You seemed to have worked out that I at least have some familiarity with the subject matter. Ex? , Premie? What's it matter. Just stop schmoozing the innocents with quasi legal bullshit.
Remember; No misrepresentation(except yours!),
No injured or wronged parties (Voluntary subscription,no fee) and
No right to punitative damages.
The simple answer 'If you dont like it , dont ask for it' Goodnight Counsel.
Copyright implies editorial freedom. (What do you wanna do , take on the right to freedom of speech?)

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 15:50:08 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Brendan Murphy
Subject: What are 'punitative' damages, pray tell? nt
Message:

xxx

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:16:16 (GMT)
From: gerry
Email: None
To: LL.B at the Bar
Subject: Legal opinion misrepresentation???
Message:

How many Federal Court of Appeals death sentence cases have you argued and won, my friend?

Of course Marianne isn't an expert in civil law. But she sure enjoys jerking your chain.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:54 (GMT)
From: Brendan Murphy
Email: None
To: gerry
Subject: Legal opinion misrepresentation???
Message:

The point is , you silly fucking loud mouthed school teacher, she's not jerking any-one's chain- hence the comment. She should know better. Oh and we are civilised in this country-we dont have the fucking Death Penalty. Criminal law? You would be surprised Jerry - dont ask too many questions. You might not enjoy the answers,two can play at Marianne's pathetic game.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:51:22 (GMT)
From: Kelly
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Legal misrepresentation???
Message:

Hi Marianne,
This is the EV e-newsletter, and as far as I know, is distributed to anyone who wants it, by e-mail. If you go to the Elan Vital website you can subscribe to it from there, or view it online. I guess only premies would want it!! I'll give you a copy of what he really said when I see you.
Love Kelly

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:01:08 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Kelly
Subject: Does it identify who does the editing?
Message:

I am very curious about this. Is this also sent through the mail to those not on line?

Thanks, Kelly.

Marianne

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 21:29:05 (GMT)
From: Ian Dury
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Dunrite Productions
Message:

Many old-time faithful (Michael Wood and Rich Neel, to name two) who work at Dunrite Productions produce and edit theses videos.

EV MONITORS - say 'cheers' to the boys for me.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:26:08 (GMT)
From: Patrick Conlon
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: EV spin doctors are secret
Message:

Mr Rawat has always said that his words are not important. The EV spin doctors also know that when his words are transcribed they embarassingly idiotic.

And in the Radhasoami tradition the guru's words are not important. What is important is the Radhaswammy double whammy - a combo of kriya and bhakti juju. Take away the bhakti juju and you're left with seeing that your emperor has no clothes. The PWKs are firmly under the spell of that old juju and do not see how moronic the Rev is.

Time to wake up any of you premies whose brains have not turned to complete bhakti mush. Unplug yourselves from that old black magic ''filament'' and operate under your own power.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:42:33 (GMT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Patrick Conlon
Subject: Oh, the words are VERY important to this lawyer
Message:

And the words are also potentially very important to government attorneys as well. Especially if they go through the mail and amount to a fraudulent misrepresentation. I'm not saying that happened. I'm just speculating out loud.

Here's a big hug for you, Pat!

Marianne

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 20:01:41 (GMT)
From: Joe
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Maharaji's 'satsang' has always been edited
Message:

Give me a break. The man is incoherent. If they didn't edit the written stuff it would so just how incoherent it is.

Shri Hans Productions, or whoever does it now, has always edited M's 'satsang' to make it at least semi-intelligible. I understand now they edit who sections, like when he tells off-color jokes, or uses to may Hindu terms, which are not supposed to be in vogue now in the cult.

They even used to airbrush the zits off his chubby face. I kid you not. Joy can tell you more about this, as she actually worked for SHIP in the 70s. I don't know if they also tried to airbrush away one of his multiple chins, or perhaps reduce his breast size from 44D to 36B.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 22:37:58 (GMT)
From: Joy
Email: None
To: Joe
Subject: Maharaji's 'satsang' has always been edited
Message:

Yes, indeed it has always been heavily edited. I worked closely with this for many years and can attest to that (right Cliff??). Whole chunks taken out, sentences reconstructed for meaning and clarity, uh's, ah's, it's like's, you know's all removed of course. I also had the job of transcribing it (like totally divine, man, at the time) and would just try and leave that stuff out before it ever even got to the editor.

Good post, Joe, above. Never heard the word filament either, up to 1981. Can't say anything about after that time, but I can definitely and 100% unequivocally say he NEVER used that analogy from 1973-1980. So he is lying and revising there, as usual. He did however, say stuff like you quoted, and 'Surrender the reins of your life to me and I will give you peace.' Loads of stuff along than line. And stuff about Guru being not just God, but GREATER than God, because Guru SHOWS you God, which you wouldn't have been able to get to before (boy, do I take exception with that now!).

And yes, they did airbrush his zits. Don't know about the booby's, though, I think that's all his natural assets!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 21:13:26 (GMT)
From: cq
Email: None
To: Joe
Subject: call it 'ongoing revisionism' -
Message:

- I remember ooooh, long ago (like 1974, when I was slaving - sorry, premies, serving - in Hansa Graphic, the DLM printers of Maharaji's propaganda in the 70s) when the command filtered down to us that all copies of a particular photo of M wearing a blue turban were to be destroyed.

Why? - you may ask.

Someone, somewhere, said it had something to do with Nostradamus' prophecy about 'the man in the blue turban'

(incidentally, for those to whom the phrase 'man in the blue turban' might as well read 'man in the zebra-striped pyjamas' - I think Nostradamus identified this particular guy as one of several 'antichrists' who were supposed to bring numerous bad-vibe scenarios on the human race. Antichrists did he say? Ah, well, to believe in them, you've got to believe in Christs.)

.
.
.

The above is fact, not fantasy, and there are at least a dozen former (or are they still current?) premies who could attest to it, though why, I wonder, should they even bother to?

Then again, why not? (if 'the truth will set you free')


.
.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 19:53:50 (GMT)
From: Patrick Conlon
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Marianne, Fraudulent misrepresentation
Message:

Exactly. You know I can't tell you what we are working on here. But is along those lines.

The problem is that the Rev will say he did not say it. He has been very clear that he will not write a book about K (only idiotic poems) because he does not want anything in writing. The editors also maintain anonymity for the same reason. The church-ladies also refuse to put anything into writing and would never answer my emails.

They are becoming creepier and more conspiratorial by the day and that suits me and my colleagues fine because it can now be proven that a supposed not for profit ''education'' organization is being used fraudulently.

Hugs to you too and I hope those chapped lips are only from kissing the Blarney stone.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:44:12 (GMT)
From: Sandy
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Revisionism
Message:

He revised it and he didn't revise it, you know?

He did both.

He said he was he highest manifestation of God, or allowed his pr machine to print it and his mahatmas to preach those words and sentiments.

And at the same time, he answered reporters' questions like that by saying he was just a humble servant of God.

Makes me feel a bit like a blind man grabbing part of the elephant, and thinking I have the whole picture.

Is this calculated? I think so.

Sandy

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 17:54:52 (GMT)
From: Lurker #27
Email: None
To: Sandy
Subject: Revisionism
Message:

Sandy,

First off I think you are a good guy and I respect your beliefs, but how do you incorporate the above filament satsang with what is said about Maharaji on the Elan Vital website. I quote, 'He says he is an ordinary human being, no different from anybody else.'

Is there no sense of cognitive dissonance for you? How can you believe these two things at the same time?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:17:43 (GMT)
From: gerry
Email: None
To: Lurker #27
Subject: Revisionism
Message:

I used to think sheep was a 'good guy' too. Now I'm not so sure. He comes here and spouts satsang KNOWING FULL WELL it upsets people. Also he seems bent on justifying The Filament's many documented abuses by any means whatsoever.

Also, Lurker #27, do you REALLY 'respect' sheeps beliefs? I find that kinda incredible.

Shp is a lost cause, a real time waster. I don't know how long you've been lurking, but this guy is a lonely, terminally confused gas bag who is overly fond of the sound of his own 'voice.' Just thought you should know that.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:27:59 (GMT)
From: Lurker#27
Email: None
To: gerry
Subject: gerry - different strokes. . . NT
Message:

fjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 18:02:28 (GMT)
From: Sandy
Email: None
To: Lurker #27
Subject: Revisionism
Message:

Dear Lurker #27,

Yes, I do definitely feel some cognitive dissonance in the two statements.

Not to defend him, but to try to understand the syntax, I would say that by saying he's 'an ordinary human being' I think that means he eats, slee